Jump to content

Bear and Ragged

+Premium Members
  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Bear and Ragged

  1. Interesting. Small typo - In that case, leave a reviewer note so that this may be waved and investigated. Should it be waived?
  2. Interested. Like to see a write up for a category...
  3. 354 Bear and Ragged Posted first in region 41 Posted first in country 4 I'll take that. Thank you!
  4. More of a general comment, but specifically Outhouses if the OP is the only active officer. (I haven't checked out the category to see who the officers are.) If a Category is at the minimum number of officers required, and the one and only active officer drops out, there may be no one to promote new officers and keep the group active. Without intervention from Wayfrog (or others)
  5. How many officers in the group, if you drop out it could leave the group/category struggling without sufficient officers.
  6. Similar buildings, used to store grain, in the UK. Usually called a barn. Placed on stones looking like mushrooms, used to stop rodents from eating whatever is stored. Medieval? (Certainly 'old')
  7. Once looking for a cache, and found it because I found a pen on the floor near where the cache was hidden!
  8. They can remember their GPS/camera/phone, but forget a pen? (Yes, I know phones can do the GPS and camera bit! )
  9. As a Mystery cache, those most likely to go and find it, are those with some experience, and not new cachers having just found out about 'caching'... Nice idea though.
  10. Post a Log (Write Note) the owner should get an email. A week in caching terms is a rather short time... Give it more time, and see if you get a reply.
  11. As PISA-caching suggests It can help to iron out any misconceptions with language, as what is English to some, can mean something different to someone translating it to their own language!
  12. Making it PMO before/after replacing it, wont stop the cache maggot. If its where it was before you made it PMO they still know where to look...
  13. Dont know the Oregon 700. But. Have you loaded any caches from Lists or Pocket Queries to it? Try deleting them, turn off and back on, and start again. (It may be picking up from an old outdated cache file)
  14. Edit required? Instructions for posting: 4. We require at least 2 good quality photos to be taken and uploaded. Some sites, if large, may warren additional photos if deemed necessary. Should it be warrant? ie Required, not warren as in rabbit?
  15. From a Christian viewpoint a church is the "House of God" so I would consider any building - or part of - to be a House... (Other officers and other categories may have different opinions.)
  16. There is a category for places mentioned in Wikipedia
  17. Having looked at the other waymarks photographs, the lack of a photo of "the entire building" would be a "Decline" from me, sadly. Not sure how any of the other officers would decide on it. (I'd be happy to leave it, or put it to a vote, should you submit it, to see what the other officers think)
  18. Does ask for the whole building... Me? I'd take 1 or 2 photos of the handle, 1 of the door, 1 of the 'modern part, then the whole building. As you say, the handle/door IS relevant to the new part, so that's what I would show, but it still needs the whole building. I think the category is one of those that you need to know the requirements (or make sure you take enough photos!) to submit a Waymark. Needs a little thought, and isn't a 'drive by' category. (Is that a good or bad thing? ) How much of the building do you have? Think you have enough? As an officer I'd be happy to put it to a vote. (Or another officer here might say yes...)
  19. As the category doesn't exclude 'new' items, I would happily accept this, and other modern door handles and knockers - providing the required photos were there. Keep your eyes open! You may see more, and be able to get the required photos and information,
  20. "Exact Replicas" https://www.Waymarking.com/cat/details.aspx?f=1&guid=f59a7a20-2c6d-4b2b-8144-55c380702733&exp=True
  21. I've have three unfinished, dated: date created: 4/24/2009
  22. Could be part of the fact too many were photographing finals of Mysteries and Multis, with the EXIF data showing the location.
  23. Locally I was thinking "That would make a Waymark" for a lot of things/places... Started submitting one or two... Noticed someone else was submitting Waymarks, and they were not a local. (A Waymarker on holiday, Waymarking what they knew would make a Waymark.) Following a couple of messages/emails he continued with his, he offered one he knew for me to submit, and here I am, still Waymarking! (With a few of my Waymarks 'Visited' by the other Waymarker!)
  24. Methodist Churches category, if it's a good write up and mentions things like Stained Glass windows, bells at the side of the church and not inside, First/Oldest/Largest, or a 'Famous' person is buried there etc, I may suggest a category. (Usually have a quick look at Nearest Waymarks to see if they've already been approved!) One or two officers have made suggestions for other Waymarks Categories to post in when I've posted in their categories. It's appreciated!
  25. Which would encourage the fake loggers even more. REALLY need to get to the next step 9,000 to 10,00 or 20,000 to 30,000 instead of adding 10 or 20 fakes, it's going to be 100's or 1,000s at a time
  • Create New...