TKt48

Actually, it only shows like this in MapSource 6.15.7. Garmin 60CSx does not have that problem and properly displays the better mapset. At least in the Calgary area.

Great work. Thank you for your efforts! The map is indeed up to date. Even the new NE portion of the Calgary ring road is there. It makes perfect sense to have the Old Roads as a separate layer. I have one question though. Most of the roads that I looked at are duplicated. I guess that is because you had two different sources of data and one was more accurate in some areas and the other one in other areas? So, then you decided to merge them together? Would it be feasible to have the Old Roads split into two separate datasets? In the following example the "A" road appears to be more accurate than than the "B". So why have both displayed at the same time? Thanks!

This is fantastic. Thank you for the efforts! The map data is indeed up-to-date. Even the new NE portion of the Calgary ring road is there. It is definitely a good idea to have the old roads as a separate layer. I have one question though: why are there so many duplicates? I understand that the data probably came from two different sources and there was no way to determine which one was more accurate? Would it be possible to have that split into two separate layers and let the users decide which one they prefer? My first reaction is that the "B" mapset is more detailed and therefore must be much better than the "A". Thanks!