Quiggle

palmetto's suggestion is a good one, hopefully it works! To answer specifically what you did, however, if you replied, via e-mail, to the note that was left on the cache page (since you got an e-mail copy as well), that won't go to the reviewer. There's a note at the bottom of his message that says that (I have a few that repeatedly do that and never get anywhere, no matter how many times I tell them!) If you e-mailed him through his profile, he should have gotten it, however. Glad to see this one closer to getting published!

Cherokee Bill, Many of your questions can be answered by reading the entire 4 page thread.

Correct. A rather brilliant deduction on your part, Sir. Yet another astute observation. With your keen powers of deduction, you could be a detective. Feel free to debate and discuss all you want, but leave the sarcasm out of it. http://forums.Groundspeak.com/GC/index.php?act=boardrules

Moving to website forum.

As others have pointed out, there has been a mobile site for years. You can read more about it here: http://forums.Groundspeak.com/GC/index.php?showtopic=79671 On Gen 1 iPhones there is no GPS, so any GPS functionality would be in the Gen 2 iPhone.

Moving to GPS & Technology forum.

Per the quote in the first post it looks like it both does and doesn't apply to the stages of a multi cache. You missed (or misunderstood) the last sentence: "Within a single multicache or mystery/puzzle cache, there is no minimum required distance between waypoints." It's about as clear as it can be. Your own cache can have stages 10 feet apart if you felt compelled to do so. But each of those stages needs to be at least 528' apart from any other cache or stage of cache, assuming all stages are physical containers. Plaques, numbers on a benchmark, etc., are not physical stages and wouldn't be applicable to the saturation guideline.

Moving to GPS & Technology forum.

Moving to GPS & Technology forum.

The OP's cache is actually in a National Park, not a State Park.

Closing this in favor of the one started in the website forum. Please do not repeatedly post the same topic. Thanks!

Closing this in favor of the one started in the website forum. Please do not repeatedly post the same topic. Thanks!

Closing this in favor of the one started in the website forum. Please do not repeatedly post the same topic. Thanks!

Thread closed. Feel free to take it to e-mail or the off-topic forum.

Moving to regional forums. (PS: You might want to check out the Maryland Geocaching Society, Fredericksburg Geocachers, Central Virginia Geocaching or Northern Virginia Geocaching Organization.)

The solution wasn't really as simple as you made it out to be. It was before, but not since the last guidelines revision.

Not necessarily. See Brian's examples right above your post.

Since you already posted this in the regional forums, I'm closing this one.

As was pointed out, let's not get into how to physically harm or seek revenge on this person as that ruins the game as well. Thanks.

Moving to geocoins section.

The discussion from a couple of weeks ago is here. P.S. As a reviewer, I'm not allowed to unarchive a cache to have it adopted, and the adopt tool won't adopt out archived listings.

Moving to appropriate forum.

The way he set the cache up, yes, you had two known points. If you want to just use one spot and have them visit the other to get the coords, then find the cache, I don't see why that wouldn't work. As long as the information is there on the cache page for how to find it, you're okay.

If you haven't already, post a note on the page saying the cache is up for adoption. You may also try posting in your local geocaching club's forums or in the regional forums here on this site. Report your thread (using the Report button) and ask it to be moved there if you wish.

If the information on the cache page tells them how to find it, that's sufficient. Here is an example of one. Hopefully the chiggers won't be bad at yours.