Against my better judgment I’m going to chime in here. First let me say that the cache that you have been directed to look at is mine. The reason I posted the note that I did was that I thought by shedding light on this persons cheating that it might curb their activity. Let me also say it wasn’t just about logging caches that they didn’t find. If you did anything disagreeable to this cacher, your caches would start disappearing, your name would get slandered around with outlandish lies or you may even receive indirect threats.
I grew tired of the behavior of this cacher and his so called team and decided for my own part I would take a stand. I had been discussing at length with other local cachers about deleting the false finds on our caches. No one could decide when the right time would be to do so. When the confessing cacher ended his relationship with the “team captain” and ousted publicly the wrong doings on mine and several other owners’ caches I decided it was time for me to act. I had already deleted the “only female member” of the team’s logs because we discovered that she wasn’t a cacher at all and didn’t realize she even had an account at GC.Com. It was a photo clerk from a local retailer that they had “made friends” with long enough to get some photos for a “sock puppet account”. This account was used to taunt another local female cacher and bash her. I then deleted all of the finds for the “team captain” from my caches explaining that his behavior towards others was unacceptable and he would not continue to play out his charade using my caches.
This person’s only goal is to be number one in his state and I guess eventually in geocaching period. Although his account says it’s all about the fun and friends to make up for the caches that myself and some other locals deleted him from he started logging “attended” over and over again on one of his archived events. He made up cache descriptions and logs in an attempt to make the logs convincing but most of the descriptions are wrong.
This person was notorious for changing his screen name before that feature was locked. About the time the account names were locked was the same time the second sock puppet account mentioned in KK log above was made up. It has no finds, no hides, no nothing and has been active since January of this year. Even if you were a newbie cacher certainly you would have had some activity in eight months time. I made all of my caches premium members only so that I could see who had been looking at my caches because of the destructive behavior of this cacher. The account mention by KK above looks at my caches and the caches of other owners in this area almost daily, yet never logs a cache, never hides a cache, does nothing but look. This account is used solely for nothing other than hiding someone’s identity.
We as a geocaching community were trying to police our own as we have been instructed to do. When you have a cacher that goes about slandering people’s names, destroying numerous caches and generally causing a disturbance wherever he goes, you can see why he might have a reason to hide his identity. I too agree that an account that has been used for nothing but lurking for an extended period of time should be looked into. Eight months is a long time. I don’t think this answers why are sock puppets allowed, but it may at least shed some light on why this particular set of sock puppets are in question in the first place.