Fair enough. It was just one solution I came up with on the fly. If the form system were implemented, Geocaching.com would (hopefully) not let someone log the cache without correctly submitting the form.
Really, I just want virtuals back.
Me too, although I'd like to see controls on them so we don't get overrun with them put in utterly interesting places like the QR-code based game that must not be named here. In urban areas it would be more interesting to view a monument or point of historical interest and focus on it, rather than seeing it and then trying to find a nano while hundreds of muggles interested in the history wonder why that person is tying their shoelaces for the 14th time in as many minutes.
Thinking about the form system, if the form rejected "Joe Blwo" because the correct answer was "Joe Blow" the person submitting would at least have the chance to realise they mistyped and try again. And much like geochecker, it could restrict the number of attempts to stop people making endless guesses. Maybe two or three goes per 10 minutes would make sense - if you get it wrong once take care to retype correctly the second time because if you get that wrong you'll be waiting 10 minutes before you can claim the cache.
This sounds like a viable solution to me. I'm sure Groundspeak could implement stuff like this fairly easily, and I think it would be worth being able to create a virtual again.
I wouldn't be against a find limit either. Like, you have to find so many caches (or virtuals) to be allowed to create one. Maybe it would be a premium member only feature to create one.