Jump to content

The_Mitch

+Premium Members
  • Posts

    7
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by The_Mitch

  1. 11 hours ago, Keystone said:

    I looked at the Letterbox Hybrid cache that you found recently.  In case you were wondering, that cache meets the minimum requirements for GPS usage by providing an alternative method for finding the cache using GPS.  It's down at the bottom after the "treasure hunt" clues:

     

     

    You could set up a cache with the same design today.  If you included a letterboxing stamp in the final container, then it would be a Letterbox Hybrid cache.  If you didn't have a letterboxing stamp, then it would be a Multi-Cache or Mystery Cache, depending on the details.

    Thank you. I’m not really interested in placing a letterbox hybrid cache. What differentiation is there for the treasure hunting examples you gave to make it a multi or a mystery?

  2. I found my first Letterbox cache the other day and quite enjoyed the treasure map format of following the clues from location to location.  I realize this format is no longer available and multi-caches have for the most part replaced it with waypoints.  Are there any existing Mystery caches that use this format within the guidelines? I’m interested in placing them and would like to see the GC online as well as read the logs to see if they were well received. Any shared GC’s would be appreciated.

  3. I found 2 physical logs in the field about 30 feet from each other.  I signed the log and logged online the GC matching the online log and paper log that matched.  The other did not have a GC code on the paper for me to search.  I was hoping to generate a map of nearby archived and log it on paper and online as a find.  All searches online say Project GC has a checkbox for archived to filter this but I don’t see this and only find “Disabled” as an option.

×
×
  • Create New...