Xylanthrop

No, in my example it is clearly the "date of visit" (12/05/2014) that is shown and not the "date of creation" (12/09/2014). (Although probably in many cases users immediately notice that they have not set the date for a log so the date of creation equals the date of visit when they delete such a log.) Great! I hope the date "Found by User" (upper row) will then be a direct link to the corresponding log ...

On the "Search For Geocaches" page (http://www.geocaching.com/seek/nearest.aspx?ul=John+Doe) you encounter wrong "Found by User" dates in some cases when a find-log with a newer date for a certain cache has been deleted. The date shown on this page is always the latest date of any find-log in the database regardless of the archived status of the log-entries for this cache. Nevertheless the row where this cache shows up on the page(s) is at the correct position of the actual date of the non-archived log-entry. (which means, that the log dates used for sorting the find-logs and for displaying the date are not taken from the same source although they would have to be!) Probably the same bug is responsible for wrong dates in the second row of this column, where you can find "green" dates for caches where your find-log has been deleted by the owner. And maybe another but somehow connected error: If you have correct multiple find-logs on a certain cache on different dates the "Search For Geocaches" page (http://www.geocaching.com/seek/nearest.aspx?ul=John+Doe) will only show the date of the latest find-log regardless of the actual date of the individual find-logs. I can give specific examples if they could be helpful for bugtracking. (please request them via profile-mail for Xylanthrop)

Probably everything has been said hundreds of times, but obviously it has not been heard. I filter incoming mails to send the important ones to my mobile. Now with the HTML version and the wasting of space even in the subject line I'm not able to see enough content in the mobile mailer overview to decide if this one is worth looking at. Please, shorten the messages as much as you can! The old [GEO], [LOG] system was perfect, you can add [NEW] if you want. Adding the "Owner" to the notification was overdue, thank you! But, on the other hand, give us back the "distance/bearing" info. If you're covering a wide radius with notifications, at least I do not know the names of more than 10.000 caches in the area any more. Last point: I make an urgent plea for giving me & us the text mode back! Worldwide the internet providers struggle about capacity. But you seem to think, that an increase of 400% in mail notification size does not matter. BTW If there were some content in it, fine. But you just seem to send out millions of links per day to facebook, twitter, google, apple, and alike. What for? Regards from Berlin, Germany