Jump to content

Cache Liberation Front

+Premium Members
  • Posts

    369
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Cache Liberation Front

  1. Hi all, I've been searching past posts re: NiMH batteries, and I think I'll try out the Sanyo Eneloops with my 60CSx. It seems folks really like them (have they advanced beyond 2000 mAh though?). But from what I can tell (as a n00b to rechargeables), the batteries are only half the story. It appears the charger is key, as well. Can someone recommend a charger that works both in home and in the car which won't fry the batteries and which will charge them at a decent rate (I don't NEED a 15 min charge, but I suppose it would be nice)? Thanks in advance, Comrade Ammocanov of the CLF.
  2. Bumping to the top, this is one great deal, w/ either the Sirf or MTK chipset.
  3. Ugh, similar to the OP, I'm trying to decide between the Oregon 300 and the PN-40. Honestly, I just can't decide! Heh. Delorme folks keep talking about "Cache Register." Is this supposed to be a "GSAK for the Delorme?" Erm, does GSAK work with the Delorme? I can't imagine not using GSAK, I love all its capabilities.
  4. I just stumbled upon this at Garmin's site, anyone know anything about them? I've been AWOL from caching a bit (new baby), so perhaps this is old news? https://buy.garmin.com/shop/shop.do?cID=&pID=26875 Looks like a nice device, with a pretty decent camera.
  5. Perhaps this has already been asked but can you expand on this a little because to be quite frank, I fail to see how this can be the case unless there is/was some horribly inefficient code generating the KML. At the end of the day, the KML Overlay is/was a location search like any other - it boils down to asking the database server to 'return the caches near location X'. The only thing that's different is the presentation layer. Instead of output in HTML (for bog standard location searches) or JSON for the Google Map, the output is a KML document. If it's the KML builder that's causing the slow-down, might I suggest a better solution might be to resolve the bottleneck within it rather than just axing a useful feature. I'm sure I'm echoing what's already been said here but the problem is not that you're "changing the routine", but that you're removing one of the site's most useful features. Sure, there are alternatives but none of them are as slick, easy to use and responsive as the KML Overlay. Further, those that want to continue to use GE to find caches they wish to hunt will now have to perform a PQ (GE opens GPX files quite happily and seems to understand the Groundspeak namespace to boot) but I'm sure I these extra PQs probably negate the performance gain from axing the KML Overlay (Edited to fix broken quote tags ) Well spoken but in the end I think futile. The frog has spoken and they have made it quite clear that they do not care if it was a better tool. It matters not that so many have pointed out that perhaps making a change in the way the KML was generated or implemented may have been a better solution. They have made it abundantly clear that they don't care to explain what the root of the problem was. TPTB are quite happy to say "Site performance" and leave it at that. Me, I used to use my PQs as needed. As I was preparing to go caching I ran a fresh one and went with it. Now I am going to start using every one I can. Five a day. I will most likely delete 95 percent of them unopened but as long as I have paid for them I am going to give the server what little hit I can. I encourage the rest of you to do likewise. Will it help? I doubt it. Will it have enough of an impact to make 'em pay attention? Not likely. But we won't know if we don't try. I've been out of caching a few months, with a new baby and all, but I was shocked to see THE most helpful geocaching tool outside of GSAK, the GE .KML file, shut down. Ack, what a horrible decision. I'll have to take the above cacher's interesting approach now, too. CLF.
  6. Vinny, Can I use your post as my new signature line? Wow, you KNOW there's something wrong with Groundspeak policy when it finds you on the same side of the fence with someone with rampant bigotry in their signature. *shrug*
  7. Punishing the many due to the actions of a few? Throwing out the baby with the bath water? Catering to the simple and punishing the creative? Appealing to the lowest common denominator? Huh, I was taught as a child how easily to avoid these pitfalls. You'd think any person or business with a modicum of self-respect would try and avoid these easily avoidable mistakes....
  8. I have a Kindle 2 and using the WAP site, I logged in fine, searched for caches by zip code fine, found and logged a note on one of my caches just fine. It wasn't a very fast endeavor, but then again, it wasn't all that slow either. I'm impressed.
  9. I've been unable to upload images to my caches for a bit now. Just heads-up to Groundspeak, your image server might be down.
  10. thanks but i was lucky enough to score a unit at amazon this morning for $159. Mind my asking how folks are getting 60Csx's for only $159 at Amazon?! That's an amazing deal, and I'll buy another one for family if I can find it. Ack, nevermind, I found a bunch of threads regarding this on the front page. Thanks, Comrade Ammocanov of the CLF.
  11. Just how did you think Geocaching started in the first place? Hmmmmm? Without the military you'd be without your GPS and your Geocaching, so, have some respect, eh? Thanks, Mac Wow. To slaughter Hamlet, methinks thou doth protesth too much, m'lady. I didn't criticize your beloved military, I just asked the mods to kindly move this thread where it belonged: the OT forum. I cruise these "Geocaching Topics" forums to learn and discussing things geocaching related, and your thread here is simply distracting clutter in that regard. How 'bout I create a thread here regarding global warming? By your logic, without the globe there'd be no geocaching, so it's a "Geocaching Topic"! MrW.
  12. The last 6 MONTHS of posts (the last 27 posts) have had nothing to do with geocaching. Mods, would you be so kind as to move this thread over to your own OFF-TOPIC forum? Thanks.
  13. You bet, will do. When I put the Oct event in the queue I'll be sure to mention it'll be the awards ceremony. Cheers, MrW. The polls are now open! Go to: http://www.cacheaddicts.org/awards1/public...hp?name=bestof1 and vote for your favorite nominees. Please note, IP address will be tracked and monitored very carefully, as will geocaching.com IDs. Let's keep it clean, folks, this is just a friendly competition. I've got a lot on my plate right now, so please don't waste my time with proxy servers and other "creative" ballot box stuffing that I'd have to sort out. Polls will be open until till 11:59pm on Saturday 9/6/08. Thanks, and may the best caches win! James aka Mr. Wisearse.
  14. You bet, will do. When I put the Oct event in the queue I'll be sure to mention it'll be the awards ceremony. Cheers, MrW.
  15. So that we have time to get the awards together, we're going to be closing nominations on Tuesday, August 19. The vote will then commence and last for 2 weeks. Winners will be announced and rewards handed out at the M&G on October 7. J.
  16. Hi all, Has anyone found any maps of Japan (from Garmin or from a 3rd party) that can be loaded on a 60CSx? Thanks!
  17. I have the Nokia N700 tablet, and though I love it for basic web surfing while traveling, and most importantly for reading ebooks, I really don't see it as a geocaching PDA. It's too fragile and expensive (to take on higher terrain ventures), and you have to convert the gpx files into html and then move them over to the Nokia (which seems to take an inordinate amount of time). Once the caches are in the tablet, the device takes too long to boot and drains batteries too fast for any kind of quantity in your searching. My two copper, MrW.
  18. The SoCal cacher ellspops has hidden numerous (very fun) water caches. His profile is at: http://www.geocaching.com/profile/?guid=95...77-ea0b5d0dd4d6 Maybe you can get some pointers there. MrW.
  19. If the OP is from Yuba City, and hid the caches anywhere NEAR his home, just wait, retiredprof will nab your caches in due time. MrW.
  20. Not around here, he can't. We've got mtn-man. He wrote the book on "reviewers rock". I'd pay very good money to see my reviewer take on your reviewer in a cage match. MrW.
  21. Marko Ramius down in SoCal often publishes caches withing MINUTES, not hours, but MINUTES of being submitted. Also, when there's a problem with a cache submission, he'll actually help you to make things right with the cache instead of just deny publication. I can't imagine a better reviewer. MrW.
  22. Erm, no offense, but there are already three topics about the Oregon still on the front page of this forum.
×
×
  • Create New...