BulldogBlitz

not only are you wrong, you are stupid looking too with that motorcycle cop outfit.

Actually if you could show that there wouldnt be damage done to the forest the ranger might let you. I would keep them on clearly marked trails that interconnect so you could just have them running all through the forest for a day trying to get them all. Just dont put out what size they are, and make it a mixture of micro and nano sizes. That way they will be searching hard all day. I could probably create a formal letter if you want to give to the ranger. They are very easy to create. ...and with them out there all day, just sit and wait for the guy/girl running around like a chicken wearing a hemp shirt that says something about "mother earth"...

one... why are you runnning through the woods? two... consider making a drain plug cache container.

where do you expect bears to drink?

i got a bunch of that stuff for free at the conference i was at this week. good to know it works!

sorry... but this is a game about smilies... not a game to see who can be the next jd salinger.

those suck. i prefer to have hides disguised as poison ivy leaves.

all this drama because someone is cheating in a game to find tupperware in the woods for a little pixel smiley? as for the ALR stuff, i actually try and play along with the CO on those... but that is a personal choice. we have a sacred cow in the area that believes he is the one true defender of all that is holy within geocaching and the letter of the law is the only thing that must be accounted - i.e. he refuses to do even a silly picture as an ALR...and doesn't mind threatening the CO on behalf of GS. oh...and that was a wise person who told you that about the forums. just fill in the blank _______ forums are of no use, just snarky off topic stuff.

i spent two days at an environmental conference... i filled up on can coozies...rulers... pens... and a bunch of random stuff that looks a notch above what i normally see in caches. i even got a connection to find places for CITO.

1. this particular blogger has no life outside of porn photos of mushrooms. 2. now, this particular area can have a new cache every 528 feet. 3. all those caches...should be disguised as mushrooms. after the 1,395 cache disguised like a mushroom with a big F-U log inside it, this person might get a hint.... as i told the woman at the grocery store yesterday when she asked "paper or plastic"... which one harms the environment more? the person hunting for a geocache...or the person hunting for fungus to take pictures of. **oh...forgot to add, replace that sheet with one just for them.

put it on a business card and hand them out to people telling them it will get them "10 free wings" at hooters.

TFTC. sorry i didn't sign your log... but if you like, i'll explain exactly where it is.

sure it will get too popular. i'm kinda surprised some company like rei doesn't already plant a puzzle cache at each store. to try and get you to come

seen it on several forums.... a hidden forum, or regulated entry (one forum it was based on gender, and let's just say one gender was always boring)... it never ends well, as someone always ends up getting their one true feeling hurt. ...and really, just as with the grammar nazis, there are some people who will bang their heads against the brick wall making dadgum certain that their point is the one surviving at the end of it all.

nah...the good, the bad, and the ugly.... post history is important, no matter the forum. as someone(s) pointed out above, this forum is like many others. i know for sure, sarcasm does NOT translate well - there are some people who have such a good filter for it that they have no ability to read it. then... there are some, who might look at a persons post history to determine if they were actually joking (because there are some like me that don't always use the appropriate smiley... or any at all). i saw someone's GC profile the other day. i was in awe. if i remember it right, he only had about 56 finds and had been caching for about 6 or 7 years. all of his finds were mountain tops.... or crazy spelunking type adventures. i think that's a really good geocacher. heck... who knows, it may be a secondary account, so he can look kool while he gets his fill on LPCs and forum antics.

...or one can stay on the outside, just on the edge of darkness wreaking havoc on multiple threads baiting all the forum police into mass hysteria.

there are certain tools that one should carry in their geovehicle. geo-chainsaw. geo-pruning sheers. geo-pruning saw on an extension. geo-grinder. geo-bolt cutters. geo-duct tape. geo-scuba gear. nothing is too tall, you just don't have the right tool to reach it.

Same goes for gum in baseball cards, at least not in Tops anyway. Then again the gum was intended to entice some one to buy the cards, not the other way around like cracker jack and kids meals. I bought a box of garbage pal cards about 4 years ago and the first thing I noticed was they didn't have any crappy gum in them, I was kind of bummed. The gum in card packs was the worst. You could break a tooth on it. Super Bubble was the best, with Double Bubble and Bazooka in the middle, and card pack gum at the bottom of the barrel. I used to like Big League Chew..lol..Wonder what that was promoting?.."spit".. i liked it too. i also liked candy cigs. i also grew up playing those horribly violent atari 2600 video games and listening to all that heavy metal (and other) music. i have yet to try smokeless tobacco. i actually try to avoid standing next to anyone who is smoking a cig because it bothers my eyes and i want my lungs to be pink when they fry me for the as yet to be committed violent crime. while i don't like the reasoning as i've described above to be applied wholesale, i do think there are some people who are a bit closer to the edge of the cliff and it just doesn't take that much persuasion to get them over the edge. do we really need to protect them from themselves? i thought that was what darwin's law was for...

What's a troll? a dude that lives under a bridge. so.... it's a homeless guy.

i don't have any sort of fun story like that... i've had two experiences that stand out for me, both happened outside of work. my place of business is 40 miles away from my house. in this town, all it takes is about a one mile drive either direction from the highway to get into pretty rural areas. recently, i went out, with my hardhat and reflective vest (both related to where i work, not special gc purchases). a winding rural road with little traffic.... a cop saw my car stopped and he stopped and was turning around as i stood up from a crouched position by the fencepost. as i looked to be examining the natural gas line that was near, he did another u-turn to continue on his way. at least that's what i think happened since he didn't speed off. the other... similar winding rural road that looks as if it is close to becoming a dirt road. micro in a bush, so i am there hunting... pretty much the only 4 people that could possibly use that road came through and each one asked me if i was "alright" and if i "needed help". NO!!! i'm looking for a secret container containing a piece of paper which i must sign in order to get a smiley on the internet!!!! that actually was a very long day for me, as everywhere i seemed to go, i found extra traffic for the remote locations.

After more than 1000, there are still caches that stump me. And I hope it remains that way i'm with you... there are some that can just keep me puzzled even though i see all those logs talking about what a nice PNG it was...

seems there is a fine line between his fun and yours, especially if you slid all the way through trash intent on getting a pixel and bragging rights. shoulda' encouraged the boy, you might be king of alabama now if you had.

You could not be more incorrect. You do not understand how insurance works. Everyone who buys into a health insurance policy pays a part of every claim made by anyone against that policy. The healthier the overall policy participants, the fewer the claims thus the lower the cost for everyone. And the reverse. And it's not just the health of the overall policy holders which determines how much your particular policy costs, it's things like frivolous lawsuits (which is why we need tort reform) and many other costs to the insurer (private jets, lavish conferences). Every policy holder pays part of every judgment and over-indulgent cost paid by the insurance company. Surely you didn't think the insurance company paid for these things? No, we policy holders do. That's why there is no incentive for insurers to keep costs down. Whatever costs arise, policy holders will pay for them in the form of higher premiums. The premiums that you personally pay for health insurance over your lifetime will likely not cover the costs of a single major surgery should you have to undergo one... premiums from the overall pool pay the rest. Thus the kids depicted above. It appears likely that they will incur above-average medical costs over their lifetime. It is doubtful that they will ever be able to pay enough in premiums to cover their expenses, so you and I will pay higher premiums to cover their medical expenses. Given that this is how insurance really works, do you still disagree that we all have a vested interest in making this a healthier nation and reducing health care costs? BTW - Every President I can think of has tried to enact some form of exercise and fitness program to improve Americans fitness and thus reduce health care costs. Most of those programs have been defeated. Demand your freedom and pay your premium, they go hand in hand! so basically.... you are on blue cross blue shield... and your premium goes to pay MY healthcare - on aetna (or whatever non-BCBS)?

I suppose it is a sin that I have to confess... I went out after a cache that had zero logs on it.... I wound up being the first. Instead of me running home to log the cache, I went to work. Someone else left their house with complete determination in logging (yet another) FTF only to find that I had been there several hours earlier. This is one of those sins where it really isn't clear until afterwards that it is considered a sin to ______.