At last, we have a reasonable explanation as to the motives behind what has happened to this cache and why.
I am a relatively inexperienced cacher compared to most who have posted on this topic. but maybe my view will be shared by others?
I was extremely disappointed when this cache was disabled as I had been following it for some time. Then I became confused how a cache can have its location changed (without it actually travelling anywhere), than its name - just on what at first seemed like a whim. I now have a better understanding.
People new to caching, and perhaps those with a relatively low level of experience look to those more experienced cacher's, like this CO to help us make the most from our hobby. The lack of information given on the cache page when the change was made, which is where everyone who was interested was 'watching' the cache, is for me what caused the problem. I just hope that others who may have felt as disappointed as me find this forum and read Jason Barlow's explanation.
I remain disappointed in the action, but if this is what GS allow, and what the CO wants, what can we do! The UK's loss, and Utah's gain.