Radler

Thanks a lot! It worked! And ... what surprised me most ... I could go back to the page still open with all my changes, press save, and ... ... two days later it was saved without a problem now. Not being current on web technologies I had anticipated that the site would two days later not know what this was about.

Thanks for the fast reaction! Yes, I placed the most important information into a maintenance note to keep the cache workable. Thank you! Looking forward to the fix .... Frank

I do have the same problem. This is quite annoying. I made many changes, because the forest has changed again and I need to move stages, change descriptions etc. Now I can not save my many changes. Quite annoying for somebody trying to be a good maintainer.

Und mit deiner Reviewernote vom 8. Juni hast du das Listing wieder ganz an's Ende der Warteschlange katapultiert. Na das ist ja ein wahrhaft genialer Prozess! Dass Änderungen am Listing die Zeit zurück setzen könnte ich noch gut verstehen. Aber dass zusätzliche Notes das auch tun, könnte ich nicht als sinnvoll erklären. Glückwunsch zu dieser ausgefeilten Organisation! eigengott, danke für Deine Erklärung!

Au Backe, das sind ja jetzt wohl gewöhnugsbedürftige Wartezeiten, anscheinend. Ich habe einen neuen Cache am 30. Mai übermittelt. Das war ein Montag. Vormittags. Meine Hoffnung war, dass er dann am Wochenende Life ist. Das wurde nichts. Inzwischen naht das zweite Wochenende und bisher hat es kein Lebenszeichen gegeben. Ja, es ist aktiv und ich könnte es nur noch disablen, nicht enablen. Meinen letzten Cache vor diesem habe ich in Frankreich in der Bretagne eingereicht. Am 9. Mai um 22:12. Nachfrage vom Reviewer um 0:59. Meine Antwort 7:16. Veröffentlichung 11:39. Das waren 13,5 Stunden und die längste Verzögerung kam, weil ich nachts geschlafen habe anstatt zu antworten. Frank der Radler

Clyde, thanks a lot for the fast and good help. In deed, I only had searched this page here using Ctrl-F of my browser. Therefore I appreciate your additional help on how to more effectively find previous posts on the same topic. Thanks!!!

What Browser is GSAK using when and why? I am trying to avoid Internet Exploder wherever possible. For cache listings offline and online GSAK seems to have guessed my preference and is using Firefox. (I assume that it found somewhere in my operating system configuration of registry that this is my standard browser.) But for the changes from previous display it is using IE. Can I change that, or can you, Clyde, change that? The new display of changes from previous is very nice by the way. It is a brilliant as the rest of this knife. Thanks for this outstanding tool!

I about to buy a mobile phone. I might go with a very inexpensive 75 gramm phone (sorry, don't have ounces ready). Unless ... are there any MIDP written tools out there to support paperless Geocaching on mobile phones?? It would be a shame if I missed the opportunity to maybe use a 90 gramm phone with colour display and be able to without paper and without my Palm V.

Allright, thanks to you all!! I have edited my cache listing to make it a 2. What surprised me was that I was not asked to enter a comment for the change (a change history). For all of you, who referred me to the online cache rating system: Yes, I have used it right at the start because it is perfectly integrated into the edit page. Cannot be better. But as a newcomer I found a way to misunderstand it: >Cache is in plain sight or location is fairly obvious. Yes, it is under a stone, I told everybody it is under a stone and there is only one stone around within 60 meters. So I checked this. And was done because I am allowed to check only one, it is exclusive. >Cache could be in one of several locations. Hunter may have to look for a while. Well, yes, hunter may have to look for a while. >Cache may be very well hidden, may be multi-leg, or may use clues to location. Not sure that I understand the "multi-leg" correctly, but you need to find four banks, each of them carries a sign underneath which lists the next bank as projection (x km, x °). So, well ... maybe yes for this one too. Hmmm. And now??? So I made it a 2 now. Thanks for your responses and advise. This forum seems to work very well. Radler

My first and only hidden cache has Difficulty rating 1. But it might be more a 2? Two things which I think may be non-trivial are: 1. From stage to stage hunters need to use projections instead of absolute coordinates. This does not seem as natural and easy to everbody as I thought. 2. The final is under lots of trees and the readings will likely be way off unless the hunter is very patient and carefull. Now my two questions: 1. From that description, does that sound more like a "2" to you? 2. If it is more a "2", is it good practice to edit the listing and change the rating or should I just do it better next time? Thanks for your advise, Radler

Related Question: If I own the cache the TB was placed into, is it OK to get it out and bring it to some other cache?? Of course I would log a note to the cache and the travel bug log as well.