Jump to content

brslk

+Premium Members
  • Posts

    978
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by brslk

  1. Why do Geocachers always like to endlessly discuss these silly little things?

     

    Why do people like to respond to threads they're not interested in? :D

     

    People reply to things that they have an opinion on even if their opinion is to say silly things.

     

    :D

     

    Even if their opinion is that the topic isn't worth having an opinion about? :blink::mad:

     

    That's just going to make me wanna talk about philosophy. :P

  2. My definition of find:

     

    To search for and locate an object who's location was previously unknown to the searcher.

     

    Based on my official definition, you can not find a cache that you hid, or helped hide. Wanting to get the cache off of your nearby unfound list does not change the fact that you did not find it.

     

    Maybe GS should make some why to list yourself as the CO Hider, giving you a star on the cache map rather than a smiley (found) or a unfound icon.

     

    ^ that.

    WOW, I think that is the first time that brslk and I have ever aggreed on anything.

     

    Even a broken clock is right twice a day. :blink:

  3. Doesn't it all really boil down to finding a well hidden cache in a great location that you enjoyed finding?

     

    I mean we could argue till the cows come home but we all want good, dry, well stocked, good cammo'd caches that are hidden in a good place with a nice view or a clever hide or clever cammo... etc...

     

    I love finding ammo cans but most of my finds are micros... I enjoyed them too.

     

    I have one nano ready to place but i'm not going to place it until I find somewhere other than the bottom of a park bench.

     

    As the saying goes, Its not the size that counts.

     

    Until GC decides to make the option for a nano or huge thing... it is what it is.

  4. My definition of find:

     

    To search for and locate an object who's location was previously unknown to the searcher.

     

    Based on my official definition, you can not find a cache that you hid, or helped hide. Wanting to get the cache off of your nearby unfound list does not change the fact that you did not find it.

     

    Maybe GS should make some why to list yourself as the CO Hider, giving you a star on the cache map rather than a smiley (found) or a unfound icon.

     

    ^ that.

  5. Not so much with my GPS but several times with my cell phones.

     

    When the Palm Treo first came out I was given several by my employer.

    After I lost or crushed the first 3 they made me pay for the next one.

    Which I promptly broke when it bounced out of the phone holder mounted on my dash

    and landed screen down on my gear shift knob cracking the screen.

     

    :blink:

  6. if you think about it , all caches should have a signed permission slip in the cache container itself or its just geo junk .

     

    I've thought about it and... no.

     

    If you think about it, any land managers, property owners or caretakers give signed permission, they could be held legally responsible should a cacher be injured while on their property caching.

     

    I'm also pretty sure that civic employees would get pretty tired of giving permission to anyone that wants to hide a cache in a city park and just put a blanket ban out there.

     

    Also... by paying property taxes I consider myself a partial owner of city parks.

    I give anyone in my city permission to place a cache there but will not do so in writing.

     

    If your idea became a guideline / rule then I would estimate 80% of all caches would be archived.

  7. My wife not only won't have anything to do with it, she doesn't even want to hear about it. She constantly ridicules me relating it to a "Dungeons & Dragons Club" type thing...as dorkified as it gets.

     

    I'm always sad to hear stories like that. If my spouse told me he "didn't want to hear about" something dear to my heart, and/or ridiculed me for having interests, he wouldn't be my spouse for long. Home is supposed to be your soft place to land and be accepted for who you are.

     

    Not me. They wouldn't have been my spouse in the first place if I felt that strongly about a hobby.

    Fortunately I place my wife above my hobbies.

    I can't even imagine choosing geocaching above a person I loved.

     

    But then again... I left my last wife because she was blonde and I got tired of blondes.

     

    Also met a much hotter brunette.

     

    I'm fickle.

  8. Anyway, the only side that should matter is the land manager's side. The land manager - the NCC - still says they plan to allow geocaching in the park.

     

    Many cache owners who received the first letter have not received a second, and caches continue to be needlessly archived. It's a very sad situation that could have been avoided if the reviewer had just done his research before acting. :(

    No - your the one that waded into this thicket without a machete.

     

    The reviewer in question has clearly stated that there are facts we are not aware of and too many rumors going on. I am not certain you are fully aware of the land managers full and complete position here.

     

    Don't try and back off the original intent here of throwing aside a reviewer and try to twist your intent.

     

    The original intent is to get the word out about this issue and see what others have to say. The land manager's position is in a fully public document, complete with maps. In both official languages. As soon as cacheblex was directed to these items, he retracted his decision. The land manager's position is not in question here.

     

    Clearly, something went seriously amiss here. The geocaching community's relationship with the NCC might be damaged as a result of the reviewer's actions, and local geocachers are seriously questioning why someone who lives 500 miles away, doesn't speak English, and can't be bothered to Google "Gatineau Park" was given responsibility for handling this issue.

     

    I fully respect that reviewers are volunteers who give a lot of their time to this game, but they should still be held accountable for things like this.

     

    I suggest you let it go. If you cannot let it go then perhaps you might try someplace like craigslist rants and raves section to vent.

     

    You have received some good advice so far from forum posters, Admin and even the person you called a liar.

     

    I think you are intelligent. So I think that you would agree, that when 95% of the people you ask for advice tell you that you are wrong, then you are wrong.

  9. What I don't understand is how the blog hosting place does not have anywhere to say anything about this a-hole.

     

    I also find it humorous how she likes to pretend there is a group of them when it is obviously just her nutty little head.

     

    I like the idea about placing bait caches and waiting for her to find them.

     

    I would love to confront such a person.

     

    I wouldn't resort to violence.

     

    I might however check into how environmental their life habits are.

  10. /rant I cannot stand people who cannot use punctuation or paragraph breaks properly. :)

     

    42, and I blame the smartphones for this.

     

    Meh, depends on the smart phone. Droids will get you within 5 meters in wooded areas, whereas iphones will get you within 100 feet. Huge difference. Generalizing all smartphones because most suck is a bad thing to do.

     

    Wow! do you have evidence to back that up? My iPhone gets me a lot closer than that.

    It often even gets me closer than my Garmin.

     

    Do the Droids have some sort of better GPS receiver?

    The way I heard it is that Droids will get you within 5 meters in the wooded areas, whereas iPhones will get you within 16.4041995 feet.

     

    Nice. Now tell me the final digit of pi? :unsure:

  11. Seriously, people need to stop playing cache owner when they are hunting caches.

     

    IMO, their 'help' is neither wanted nor appreciated.

    concur. this is what causes cache migration.

    shudders to see "i hid it better" in a log

    What about; I found your micro under the lamp skirt. Now this was obviously not where it was meant to be because that's so lame, so I instead placed it in the much less lame area of the guardrail 15 meters away at GZ.

     

    Or here in Canada, "found your cache in the spruce tree next to the one that my GPS said it should have been in and moved it for you".

  12. /rant I cannot stand people who cannot use punctuation or paragraph breaks properly. :laughing:

     

    42, and I blame the smartphones for this.

     

    Meh, depends on the smart phone. Droids will get you within 5 meters in wooded areas, whereas iphones will get you within 100 feet. Huge difference. Generalizing all smartphones because most suck is a bad thing to do.

     

    Wow! do you have evidence to back that up? My iPhone gets me a lot closer than that.

    It often even gets me closer than my Garmin.

     

    Do the Droids have some sort of better GPS receiver?

  13. Ok, some of you need to take a long, deep breath.

     

    Let's ratchet back the rhetoric, folks. This is supposed to be FUN after all!! B)

     

    Direct your comments toward the topic and not toward other posters individually. Thanks!

     

    From the forum guidelines (with much snipped for brevity):

     

    12. If someone has posted copyrighted material or otherwise illegal material, please notify Groundspeak so that we may take appropriate action.

     

    13. Abuse of this forum will be not be tolerated.

     

    14. You WILL have fun here!

     

    Fun is not limited to but may include what you may enjoy.

     

    My idea of fun normally includes attacking people.

     

    Most people do not find this fun.

     

    Can't figure those people out... :laughing:

  14. how many hides did he have, how many caches has he found, how long has he been a member,

     

    if you answered not many, and not long, he probably just doesnt know how to go about it, and maybe he doesnt get online much or is one of the 90% of memebers that dont post on the forum asking questions to clarify some gray rules.

     

    im sure his heart is in the right place, and he probably wants to write you a letter asking how you found it, what you liked and what you didnt, like i said, maybe hes not real computer friendly, opperating a gps and opperating some of those third party email sites are two different things,

     

    he may have also forgot to put the ftf gift card in the cache and lives far away from it. have him mail it to your work address if you are worried about it.

     

    or get a cheap po box for a month, this is way easier and way cheaper than you think, ive done it when i lived in my car, and im sure your gc would still be worth the price of a po box and peace of mind.

     

    The answer to 90% of those questions can be found by reading the forums before you ask.

  15. I also think it has a lot to do with what people find and have to compare to.

    Most of the ones listed as small I find are micros because the hider has found mostly nanos listed as micros.

     

    I was going to say something about how men always exaggerate when it comes to size but since I am a man, I won't.

     

    err... I did. ;)

  16. I carry in my small backpack:

    -a few flashlights

    -compass

    -telescopic magnet / mirror

    -small first aid kit

    -a cache repair kit (tape, ziplocks etc.)

    -pepper spray

    -cell phone

    -swag

    -pen, pencil, gel pen and a felt pen

    -gloves

    -camera

    -Leatherman multi-tool

    -batteries

    -small flare launcher and flares

    -extend able baton

    -water

    -a cache or three of various sizes ready to place

     

    I think that's about all.

×
×
  • Create New...