Alfouine

There is no problem with your reference, your problem is elsewhere, you have a red line added at the beginning of you waymark to explain what is the problem

Yes in this category, we call for a vote for all submissions, most of times we share the same point of view but sometimes not, there is a part of subjectivity And we can have multiple votes because we have a lot of multiple submissions for the same waymark

I have made nothing, if you decide to stop Waymarking, it's your own decision If you do not have times to understand how it works and if you are upset each time you have a waymark declined, it will not be a pleasure to play Waymarking especially at the beginning but the most important it's to have fun and it's possible to have fun, it's just a question of state of mind.

Dit you take time to read all this discussion ?

@BeayPepe Read this discussion, it will help you : The real impossible mission is to manage this category when someone does not understand But to understand you have to be more experienced about Waymarking and with only 5 waymarks approved, it's not enough Taking old approved waymarks examples to try to convice, it's a mistake, i did also this mistake at the beginning, reviewers change, category description changes and we use to grandfather old waymarks even if they do not comply new requirements

The leader never replied to my message...

This requirement is really easy to understand "One location may have several articles written about it, but only one waymark per location will be accepted." As in the past some waymarks have been validated not following this restriction, it was errors but you think that you have the right to publish it again. In your private message, you seem to imply that wayfrog agrees with you, i will be really happy if wayfrog could give his point of view. The problem is that in each category you have a problem when we decline one of your waymark, you did not undestand for example why an elephant drawings can not be publish in space invader category. Try to accept to have waymarks denied, all officers would feel better because we do not know how to make you understand

French people, new waymarkers, i try to explain to the leader what is necessary to create a new category, we have a facebook discussion in one of the french Waymarking group

Yes and you have a variable for business address

Does anyone could be patient enough to explain to Ariberna the naming convention of Wi-Fi hotspots category ? Required Naming Convention: Location Name - Wi-Fi Hotspot - City, State, [and] Country He is not able to understand the difference between location name and wifi network name For example, instead of writing Starbucks Coffee he is writting Starbucks wifi, he always makes the same mistake and i am not able to understand why Thank you for your help

You have to edit your waymark and delete variable content with malicious code

You have to edit your waymark and delete variables contents you did not fill. When you visit a waymark, you can fill empty variables, so they add malicious code inside these empty variables. If you fill all variables, it can not happened

For the last peer review votes, we had less than 30 votes in 3 days, and for this one 42 votes in few hours with unknown people or waymarkers who are not used to voting. It's hard to imagine that it's coincidental As you were involved in the discussion, there was no need to contact you

Strange vote, is there any lobbying...

A restaurant category is just not interesting and would be redundant, so i will vote Nay

According to me it's not a good idea, it's just not interesting I am not sure we need a new flag category. If you have 24 flags in front of a building, you could create one waymark in Flag of the world and 24 waymarks in your new category, one for each flag. Your idea is just the same idea as flags of the world with a different minimum requirement. So not interesting and redundant

Happy to see that someone can give response in a more human way in that forum when we just ask to understand Thank you Bootron

In Ghost Sign or converted factory, if it was a factory

Are you really serious ? Do you really think there is a problem with a MAx and 99 reply ?

You can also have secret vote

Ok for this challenge Anglet : 40 000 pax 0 waymark and now 14 waymarks I wanted to do Bayonne, the town nearby, 0 waymarks and 49 000 pax, i took my photos in may 2021 but someone has published only one waymark in june 2021 !! bad luck...

OK for me, just not forget to remember me few days before

As Dougk website statistics has disappeared and after the excellent Erik's contribtion, i decided to create a website about Waymarking category statistics and officers. I have others ideas to program Here is the link Waymarking category statistics Thank you for your comments

I did that, i contacted geocachers from Florida to make mine

As i am now the leader of Gazebos category, i have modified the description It was written "A clear photograph showing the entire gazebo is required" and now "A clear photograph showing the entire gazebo is required as default" So no more problem now, we all agree