Alfouine

Excellent idea, i am going to create it, i do not know yet all categories

I am impressed and affected by your attentions I created 37 waymarks around Font-romeu and few of them about "Le Musée sans mur" (Museum without wall)

OK now it's OK, it's also necessary to submit the waymark without category. Thank you for your help

OK i did it, thank you let me have a chop at it ? what does it means ?

It's completely wrong, i followed exactly the suggestion, how can you write this without checking if it's true or not ? I explained everything in the first post, why should I be a liar ? The waymark was declined in "Figurative sculpture category" the 09/30/2106 I submitted just after in "Car parts category" and it was first approved the same day but it was declined the 10/01/216 for the following reason : So as it was suggested i submitted again in "Figurative sculpture category" but the raison to decline it changed to : And only after officer's vote started, after all these activities. It's really easy to prove this, you just have to watch past activities of each group, and i kept all emails with timestamp. Everybody in the forum gave arguments to confirm this waymark fits in the "Figurative sculpture category" Last time, i thought my waymark was an utility box, everybody in the forum said "no, it's not", so i did not insist and changed the category. As a moderator you need to be objective and not subjective, there is no requirements in the category to decline my waymark and rules should be the same for everybody, leaders, officers and waymarkers.

Here the vote result : I don't understand, i submitted it to car parts (before write to the forum), they declined it but she did not accept it, and she's still writing she will approve it. It's not my idea of Waymarking, i am really disappointed With this kind of behavior, it will be difficult to become Waymarking more popular...

OK thank you for your support and translation. I am waiting for the result officer's vote, 4 days it's a long time...

Thank you for this argumentation, that is what I understood from the description. I did not make a mistake posting this waymark in this category. I think that sometimes a little bit of flexibility in approval could make things easier. BTW, what does it mean ?

Ok it's not because i do not understand english, and it's not a requirement of the category. I sent two emails to Outspoken1 and as it was the second time (first was for murals waymarks declined), my emails were not really pleasant, but she did not want to move her decision. As i wrote she took her decision alone and i have insisted for the officer's vote, she agreed at the end to submit officer's vote. And BK-Hunters gave exactly the same example of waymark, and it was approved. It's logical, a metallic sculpture can not be substractive

OK i agree to post it in an another category and i did it as it was suggested (car parts sculpture) but they declined it. But if the waymark can not be posted in another category, you can approve it, it's not conflicting with the requirement

Absurdity keep going on New waymark, new problem : My waymark Submit in Figurative Public Sculpture : There is nothing about car parts in this sculpture but why not Submit in Car Part Sculptures : Suprise, but not for a long time It's true, but no problem i have my second chance... New submission in Figurative Public Sculpture It's not serious, but may be i do not understand enough english but where in the description it's written something about subtractive and additive and how a metallic sculpture can be substractive ???

Excellent job, i call fishing port leader to give to you a reply.

End of the story, both waymarks approved in Murals category. Thank you for your help

Ok perfect for me, better than my proposal

Interesting, now category validation seems to work as it should be

Ok no problem to change color and format, and it's space invader category. @Benchmark Blasterz A great thanks

It not has been updated after i submitted here and it's the third time I sent a message to Waymizard after his validation of Tintin's icon but no answer.

I don't understand what is the problem with my icon ?

of course you don't like ?

Thank you very much for your help but i know exactly what is an utility box and i have few of them painted to publish. I thought it was a good idea to include this type of box (built in concrete) to the category but as i conviced nobody i have tried again in Murals I am sure that can be a waymark, no doubt about this....

I understand that this kind of utility box is far from US Standards. But as "murals" category officer considered these buildings as boxes it would have been nice to approve them. I will submit them again in Murals category and hope for a positive officers vote. I do not want to lose my work.

Was this added after your submission was denied, or was it there previously? As i wrote "nowhere in the description there is a requirement about the size of the box" they reply with " We will revise the description to make that clearer", so it was added after my submission I also submitted in murals Bord de cher and they denied it for the same reason. And there is too photos

Yes but for me it's really a utility box and we have a lot like this in France, but too big for the first one and to small for the second one

Hello, I published a nice waymark in "Artistically Decorated Utility Boxes" and : As i am persistent i submitted again and gave arguments : So they decide to vote and here is the result : I sent an email to the leader because i do not understant and he wrote Murals is the best category for this kind of waymark, so i submitted my waymark in "Murals" category and here is the result : Funny isn't it or absurd ??? Here is the link of the waymark : Sport d hiver Do you think i should create a new category ? Wasting my time like this it's not what i prefer in Waymarking What can i do ?