When the original cache was submitted the denial for publication was as follows:
"Thanks for the submission, but I'll have to ask you to change your Title, Description and Hint that refers to Veterans.
Groundspeak offers this Listing service with the expectation that the Listing pages will have some information about the cache, and maybe a small amount of information about the surrounding area. Listing pages are not intended to be platforms for political, religious, or social agendas."
There are obviously more than a couple problems with this, not the least of which is a blatant disregard for Veterans. I GREATLY appreciate what some of the others have said here and echo their disgust and dissatisfaction.
I would simply like to add that if this moderator was honest about his reasons he would have to quit his job. EVERY cache is either political, religious or social - seriously. We don't do this for a living - we do it for FUN - it is a SOCIAL activity. And as proven already, there are NUMEROUS political and religious caches published all the time - INCLUDING ONE HE PUBLISHED THAT SAME DAY that was admitedly "political."
A simple apology and admission of inappropriate/unjust action on the reviewers part would go a long way. Without it, it looks like this dissatisfied group of people may go a short way over the internet to a less popular but more customer friendly caching organization. That's the wonderful benefit our Veteran's provide for us - CHOICE. I'm making my choice now and it doesn't look good for Groundspeak.