Jump to content

gpicard

+Premium Members
  • Posts

    68
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by gpicard

  1. I feel your pain Two Pipers.

     

    I have had a few caches muggled by other cachers, muggles, flood waters, and logging operations. All these circumstances are frustrating.

     

    There are several threads in the forum that talk about some things you can do that might protect your caches. You may find some ideas in there that appeal to you.

     

    I don't see where Two Pipers makes an assumption that fellow cachers are to blame in his post. Am I missing something?

  2. When I cache with a group, we just ignore time of arrival. Rarely the cache has been rehidden by the time the last person arrives, so someone waits to point out where it's hidden. Someone just signs for the straggler. In fact, one person normally signs for everyone, whether we're signing individual names or with a group name.

     

    Same here.

     

    If the log does get passed around, I think it's best for the finder to rehide the cache rather than the last person signing the log.

  3. After being missing for 4 years, one of my TBs has reappeared! I guess you never know for sure...

     

    In this case the person had misplaced some bugs. I am very grateful they will get them moving again. Hopefully soon!

  4. " xxxx found This is Vermont: Roxbury (Traditional Cache) at 8/21/2012

     

    Log Date: 8/21/2012

    Souvenir Hunter! Log will be erased! Thank you!"

     

     

    I looked at the online log and there is no entry.

     

    Looked up the cacher and there is no record of the find but sure enough there is a souvenir!

     

    So should I be honored that my cache was chosen for this dubious accomplishment?

  5. I don't recall ever giving an opinion on virtual caches so here I go....

     

    I like them. I think we should be able to create new ones.

     

    There is no 'WOW' factor for other cache types and I don't think we need that requirement for virtual caches.

     

    There are lame caches of every type. I choose which caches I want to seek.

     

    If the listing or location looks lame I won't seek the cache.

     

    There are locations where I won't place a physical cache but I would place a virtual.

     

    I don't think there should be special requirements that make a reviewer's job any harder than it already is.

     

    We can make cache listing very complicated of keep it simple. The cream will rise to the top. The less desirable caches will fade away.

     

    Thanks for listening!

  6. I have a cache that regularly gets taken after a find log. I marked it for premium members only and asked someone to log a find log. In my case it just confirmed what I already knew. It is very sad to think that a fellow cacher is involved.

     

    I have decide to keep replacing my cache but I no longer enter a maint log entry.

     

    guy

  7. I had a group of six caches published in less than an hour a few weeks ago. Currently on my second day of a group of eight.

     

    Good comment about wondering if you did something wrong! You get used to quick turnaround and wonder if you did something wrong when it takes a NORMAL length of time!

     

    Reviewer must be taking a day or so off which is well deserved.

     

    guy

  8. I have seen some multi caches / unknown caches where the first stage(s) of the cache are located in extremely scenic spots where a physical stage can not be hidden. The directions to the final stage are very basic.

     

    For these caches the first stage is worth the visit and the final may be worth only a smiley.

     

    guy

  9. Wow! What a cute, but terrible idea! I applaude the cache owner's attempt to do something different, but not everything different is better, as this cache clearly shows! I don't own a laptop, so the only way I would have been able to log it would be to bring the USB key home with me. Not that I would subject my home computer to that risk, mind you.

     

    Not the only option. You could have brought a USB key with you and swapped it for the USB in the cache. That would have saved you a few seconds when "signing the log" so that you could find more caches that day. :yikes:

     

    ...and the USB drive that you find may not be the USB drive the CO left and it may contain.... who knows.

     

    A for effort though!!

×
×
  • Create New...