Many interesting points have been made in this thread. The thing that interests me (and somewhat concerns me) is that it changes the role of the website and logging etc for owners of this device. Before this device, cachers pretty much needed to have an account, and thus encouraged to log their finds, read about etiquette, trackables etc. Part of the advertised value of this device is that you don’t need to go online, ever, to cache with the Geomate.jr.
I’m most concerned about trackables, only because I (and my children) find them fun. We like finding them and hiding them, and seeing where they have been. Even now, not everyone correctly logs trackables when they find them, so they often show as being in a cache where they are not, but generally the system works. The documentation with the Geomate.jr makes no mention of trackables and how to handle them. So it is reasonable to expect that many Geomate.jr users may take them without logging them.
How much of a problem this turns out to be will depend on the sales success. If the sales are small, then overall I would expect little impact. A few more trackables go missing, etc. But if they sell loads of these, it could really hurt the whole concept of trackables.
The other factor will be what percentage of Geomate.jr users will register online with geocaching.com? If most of them do, then I don’t see a big problem.
The worst case scenario is they sell “millions” of these things, and very few of the users create accounts to log their visits or trackable finds. That could have a very negative impact.
So I’m hoping sales of this are not too successful, and/or that the majority of Geomate.jr owners still manage to discover the value of being a member and logging their finds/trackables online.
I think Groundspeak is taking a risk here in allowing a device which by design bypasses the need to use their website.