After 200+ finds and over six months of caching, I am still relatively new to caching, but do have questions about terrain ratings. I have even hid three of my own and used the tool that is accessible to help rate terrain. However, I come across big time inconsistencies in how caches are rated, terrain-wise.
For instance, I have one find that was a 3.5 terrain rating, that was a walk around a lake in a subdivision and the cache was in some tall grass just off the trail. Conversely, yesterday, we found one that made us crawl both over and under fallen trees, fight thick briar patches, wade through grass that was hip-deep, and was at least 1/2 mile inside all of this. It's rating was a 3.0.
Just curious if anyone else had come across these inconsistencies, AND is contacting the CO with suggestions acceptable?