Jump to content

Gustaf

Members
  • Posts

    99
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Gustaf

  1. quote:
    Originally posted by Cheesehead Dave:

    Just out of curiosity, where do they get the numbers? Is Jeremy's database open for anyone to read or have people just hacked a way in?


     

    Everything that you can view in your web browser can also be read by a computer program. A program that reads a lot of pages can extract a lot of information from them. It's not hacking - just clever programming icon_wink.gif

  2. quote:
    Originally posted by The Artful Dodger:

     

    It is difficult to program a 'Last Weeks' or 'Last Months' position next to the table?

     

    ...just wondering....


    I have been thinking about that too and yes, it is difficult.

     

    So that will have to wait for another month or so...

  3. quote:
    Originally posted by Seth!:

    I would love to see this, "There are now caches hidden in 111 countries!" (statement on the home page) link to a list of the countries with the number of active geocaches in that country next to each country.


    You can find something like that here.

  4. quote:
    Originally posted by Seth!:

    I would love to see this, "There are now caches hidden in 111 countries!" (statement on the home page) link to a list of the countries with the number of active geocaches in that country next to each country.


    You can find something like that here.

  5. quote:
    Originally posted by BigNick:

    I was just wondering today how many people have used Ammo Can's to hide caches in New Zealand, but you can't do a search on the contents of cache pages, only the Cache Name.


    You can use Google with "site: geocaching.com" and the key words you like. It works fine, but you won't find any recently added caches.

     

    Here are some New Zealand caches. None of them contains the word "ammo".

     

    [This message was edited by Gustaf on March 18, 2002 at 09:54 AM.]

  6. quote:
    Originally posted by BigNick:

    I was just wondering today how many people have used Ammo Can's to hide caches in New Zealand, but you can't do a search on the contents of cache pages, only the Cache Name.


    You can use Google with "site: geocaching.com" and the key words you like. It works fine, but you won't find any recently added caches.

     

    Here are some New Zealand caches. None of them contains the word "ammo".

     

    [This message was edited by Gustaf on March 18, 2002 at 09:54 AM.]

  7. quote:
    Originally posted by SNIFTER:

    Just make sure that the cache container you use is definately watertight. Fill your bathtub and give it a test.


     

    I have used a stainless steel thermos as cache container for an underwater cache. I put coins in it to make it heavy enough to stay down. It is anchored with a plactic coated wire and the depth is about 12 feet, but I tested it at 24 feet, and it was still dry inside.

  8. In the cache listings, the caches are sorted by Date Listed. How about other options? Click on Cache Name to get the list sorted by names! It would be interesting to be able to sort by Difficulty & Terrain too. Or by Last Found - useful if you want to see which of the caches in your area that was found the last few days!

     

    Shouldn't be that hard to implement too.

  9. Yes, i would like to audit my caches, but i did vote no!

     

    In this country we are still waiting for the Geocaching boom. When people get into Geocaching, they usually start by visiting the site, checking to see if there are any caches close to where they live. If so, they might go out and find one, then register and log their find on the web site.

     

    If they had to register before they could start looking for caches, most of them would probably not bother at all.

  10. I think rating is a good idea.

     

    Why not try this: For every 10 caches you have found, you may vote for 1. So if you have found 34 (like me), you may pick 3 of them that you really enjoyed - your personal top 10%. I think that would be more fair than letting everyone pick 10 caches. And a lot of caches will get no votes at all, so we're not being rude to anyone, just giving credit to those who deserve it.

×
×
  • Create New...