24hawki

Thanks Darin, but that is my problem. Available 'information' at each selected GZ stage isn't easy, unless I want someone to count trees, if you get my drift. I appreciate your input though. Thank you!

Got it. Thanks.

http://www.geocaching.com/about/guidelines.aspx B. Just trying to place a multi-cache that highlights good tourism spots to visit in my community within the theme of 'visit our town'. The locations that are appropriate have other physical caches within 528 feet, but not at the best spot to enjoy the location. Bummer. Apparently too many rules/guidelines to put out a nice "tourist friendly" cache. Thanks "B" for your input.

Looking to place a multi-cache in my area where the interim stages are metal tags with engraved or UV coordinates. Is the 'metal tag' a "physical container" that falls under the saturation rule that requires a 528 foot gap from other non-related cache container locations? I found a multi-cache in Indiana where the first stage was a tag inside of the 528 foot radius of another nearby cache. "Virtual" locations where information needs to be observed/acquired are allowed, as far as I know. Obviously, the tags would not be a container that needs to be opened to acquire next stage information. Need help and clarification!!

For the past 24 hours, the small maps on cache pages are not displaying, and logs are not viewable without clicking on "View Logs". What gives?????

I think this hits the nail on the head for today's "upgrade". Making changes for the sake of looking like progress is being made is senseless. Update the site when it is truly needed for what the "customer base" is asking for and what is really needed!! Some recent updates have been nice, but doing it for the sake of looking like you're doing something is stupid. Resources should be focused on what is "needed", instead of making changes simply to "make changes". Frankly, I think the "making changes" attitude over the last couple of years has been needlessly in "overdrive".