Ariberna

Yes Becktracker do not be angry or worry. I got tired of being denied "hórreos" in barns and yet they created the category of Elevated buildings :-) It is difficult to create news cathegories if there aren't global. Hundreds of all there are only for USA.

I like it, PISA Good work.

Those categories that you say are that "problem". Photo goals, the truth is, like ISS Satellite. Blogs and municipal flags, because the first one you can even publish without a photo (I didn't do it, my blog posts have photos of my visits, as I did an entry in a forum here). But not only that, there are categories that I have not been able to deny as a brand creator because they do not ask for a visit photo such as wikipedia or news article, among others. Those that do not require a mandatory photo visit, the fault lies with the creators of the categories, who do not change this. Other things are in a hurry to change them, but not that, they won't be interested.- From my point of view, everything should require a correct photo: post and visit.

Why not? is Catholic- Roman Catholic Church, it puts in the information panel: kathoilike

And other problem in WM is that the logs deleted don't appear some in Geocaxhing that the deleted can be write why.. .

Hi Picarax, Nice to meet you in the forum. I'm sorry that you have problems at the begining. Always we had problems at the begining. In fact I started on April 2017 but some reviewers was very bad and I wanted to continue. Later on July 2020 I return very hard, and since then I knew better the reviewers and some are good and some bad (less, but there are some) Sometimes I deleted logs because they do not correspond to what was requested, but it does not seem your case. Don't worry and go away and publish more. And if there are some problematic reviewer should take action Wayfrog, as happened in some categories, which reviewers deny when WM was published to them in bad shape. See the forums and you can see problems in cathegories with the same revisor(s) Then they say that what was published wrong, is published, but they canceled my publication and others did not. Luck.

now I send others, to see why they deny them. At the moment one denied because it said it was news, when a variable of "Primary blog type" is NEWS. I have to send my private photos scaned because all my WM published in Mauritius, Bali, Jamaica, Cuba, etc are with stolen photos as some say. I see WM published by people who weren't even there, but I'm interested because I'm worried about creating many reference brands... I'm waiting.

Hi Max. Photo won't was the problem, I submited blogs of countries when I were. If they want to change "Also, the category needs a re-write to restrict submissions like these, as anyone can submit to the category without actually visiting the a blog location" is no problem, because I was in that countries. Problem was other things: that were stolen photos, I want submit lot of WM ... If I send to review 2000 WM in the cathegory ISS you will denied me because "Submitter is just trying to get waymark numbers." ? I know that no ;-)

Today I recived that has been declined all af the WM in the cathegory bloggers that I send to review 9 days ago. There were voted for the reviewers but I want to share some coments and preocupations. One revisor say "This is a website with a blog, not a website for a blog. Easy deny. Plus this isn't the submitter's photos." The first part before easy deny could be fine or not, but "Plus this isn't the submitter's photos." If you see the WM that I published in this country you will be that I sateyed in the country (posted): VISITED: Other coment of other revisor: "I don't think the submitter has even visited Egypt and the pyramids??? The lone photo upload is small and poor quality and don't even feel it's his photo, but stolen from another site/person. Shameful if so." I had three photos of Egypt in 2010, that was printed, I was a problem with the camera and that time I haven't cloud or goolge photos, and I keep 3 photos in paper. The same revisor in other WM "A crappy photo used, did the submitter actually visit the country? " If you see my WM's you can see the photos of mine in the country. (See Chichén Itzá https://www.Waymarking.com/gallery/image.aspx?f=1&guid=17e60a4c-072f-4c2d-bded-3372b7efc42e&gid=3 ) I'm. If you see some WM you can see me in same countries. Other photo But you can think that was stolen to other people. Do you want my registration of this GPS? My plane tickets? stuffed doddo from Mauritius. The coment (I think that the same last revisor "Submitter is just trying to get waymark numbers." shows us the true transparency of their votes and personal interests. I didn't know this was a competition, or that it bothered people that someone wanted to get benchmarks. Would there be a problem if I did 20,000 WM on Places of Recycling? Would this person mind? Other comment in Mauritios WM blog: "Submitter is just trying to get waymark numbers, hasn't proven he has even been to this location in person with photos and personal experience. Also, the category needs a re-write to restrict submissions like these, as anyone can submit to the category without actually visiting the a blog location." I think that the previous photo is for you. Don't worry, I no longer sent the ones I don't have photos of, because seeing how some of them act... I think that some of them are not suitable for the category (or for be revisor) Although as always, thank you for being volunteers.

My congratulation and thanks too

I'll vote for expanding, of course. (2) And I vote that the photos that put Scroogiell and Bon echo were in the future, candidates to a CITO :-)

Hi, Anyone could have visible passes of ISS february 2 https://heavens-above.com/passdetails.aspx?lat=42.3178&lng=-7.8817&loc=A+Valenzá&alt=0&tz=CET&satid=25544&mjd=59612.8226736576&type=V and february 3 https://heavens-above.com/passdetails.aspx?lat=42.3178&lng=-7.8817&loc=A+Valenzá&alt=0&tz=CET&satid=25544&mjd=59613.7893851944&type=V ? Will be from WNW and NW , and I see often when it came of the SW . 20:39 and 19:51 Spanish time GMT+1

Good game in this forum. For me: 1) My street 2) under 10000close Córcega 3) under 10000 between Antártida and Ciudad del Cabo 4) 3 but more right :-)

Today 554 posting day and... 5000 WN now! 🎉🙈🙉🙊

Yes scroogiell, IT¡s no problem, I had more ISS Yes Max, I'm pending Thanks

This expresion "or even two partners saw a satellite, but someone who also saw it (and is within the distance of being able to share WM) is left without being able to register it?" Was a mistake because at that time I did not perceive that this problem would be solved by seeing the published WM of two colleagues. The last sentence: "well,..." It is a redundancy of if I see an ISS or I am going to see and I did not notify a colleague, to be able to put here in case someone who saw it appears. At the moment I'm happy because I saw ISS with french Waymarkers. But I thought about this thread because while walking on vacation I saw one with the family in the Canary Islands and it was a shame

For example: today I'm walking here and I see and took photo of one satellite, that I didn't create and I put here that I saw XXX ISS. Other person that could have the same answer and we can create an ISS. Or I put here that the day 20 this ISS couod be available for me https://heavens-above.com/passdetails.aspx?lat=42.3178&lng=-7.8817&loc=A+Valenzá&alt=0&tz=CET&satid=25544&mjd=59599.7873998792&type=V And other write that is interested. Sorry for my english skills

I've been checking and couldn't find a thread for this type of WM. How many times can we see a satellite and we have not had time to talk with a partner, or even two partners saw a satellite, but someone who also saw it (and is within the distance of being able to share WM) is left without being able to register it? Well, here we can write down what we saw or did (especially those that were not published)

For all WM's

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year Heith and Waymarkers

Hello, The web off WM don't permit change the cathegory of a WM. Put an error has occurred and I can't edit, delete, etc

Other (in the right hand) : Waymark Sticker and Pin Seekers

Hi people: Today that social media weren,t ok, grows ibne this curiosity: Why do reviewers (except Alfouine, Keith, Lumbricus and little else who sign their approved or denied with good reasons) deny you a WM it appears as denied as a category group (not by the reviewer) and when it is approved the name of the reviewer? for statistical interest? not to receive private? It is a curiosity that I have. Greetings.

Well, it doesn't seem like a good plan to me. Posted WM should not be canceled.

I corrected too.