Jump to content

Ariberna

+Premium Members
  • Posts

    324
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Ariberna

  1. "And now there are 51 Ways to Leave Your Lover!" ??
  2. Is it only cine? If not Livestage theater
  3. Thanks Benchmark Blastezr for your words. Pepe deserves those words and more. The "hispano clan" needs people as some nice reviewers who have helped make all of this possible and help keep it going. We are working in the cathegory with the aim to be better and clarify more. Thanks.
  4. Regardless, the category is...approved. Thank you Pepe for your enormous effort and to the people who considered that this category should move forward
  5. I don't know what you know and what you don't. But there are rules that you don't mind being changed to the taste and preference of each one. And categories that you don't much to Update. As you said: Welcome to the new WM.
  6. Some of those people who believe that WM is only interested in posting and not visiting, that you prefer to only make marks and never visit, stay with that old and obsolete WM. But a few Spanish WM have gone to countries with WM from more than 10 years ago and without a visit. I don't want that WM, with it which one do i have many more visited than created Welcome to New Waymarking
  7. Thanks for all Outspoken1 and Benchmark Blasterz. Both were briliant in the forum Not so another who seems to be bothered by the proposals that go from the other side of the pond. Of course there are new ideas in WM and you have to change. Starting with the more than 500 exclusive categories in the USA in which some made their fiefdom. Change things like not supporting WM in certain categories for being in the same point when a few reviewers have more than 10000 WM created with News article, Wikipedia, etc from the one posted person in the same place was considered deprecated and now changed. I had to adapt to your Waymarking, since I had the feeling that nothing could be contributed, but lately new categories have come out such as knockers, elevated buildings, italian and nordic heritage, pancakes, puzzles, etc. Another thanks to Outspoken and Bench for the clarifications, but I don't think you will muddy the issue.
  8. As? I am not finding out. Did the silhouette category guidelines just change to deny a vote? Was it consented to by all the officers? voted in the middle of this vote?
  9. Anyone have to include another page, or you won't be able to publish in this category.
  10. And could be deleted for that by owner of WM?
  11. Well, but then they can delete a WM record because the owner doesn't like your photo when the category puts:" There are no log instructions listed for this k in category."
  12. I think you explained it well in the other thread. I like the way you act. Thanks for all The Blue Qasar, It is good that you returned to the category. WM needs people (especially reviewers) like you: open to dialogue, willing to change, to correct mistakes and, above all, to explain their category.
  13. Ok, thanks. Other cathegory that if don't change the web if the requisit (as sucessed in skyscraper) will die...
  14. Is this web of Great buildings http://www.greatbuildings.com./ inactive or only in my country? There are some days inactive...
  15. And what also surprises me is this comment: "It appears that this person has joined this category in order to force through their way mark that does not conform." I did not know that entering a category forced a publication. I'll have to go into more and see if it works. That leads me to think that was how they acted in the past. As we say in Spain "piensa el ladrón que todos son de su condición" this phrase say that "the thief thinks that everyone is like him"
  16. And with regard to this comment: "But to understand you have to have more experience in Waymarking and with only 5 approved waymarks it is not enough" there are reviewers with very few WMs created and they are reviewers, as well as others who have 2,000 or 3,000 published and very few visited, so the only 5 WMs left over from the forum and fall alone, A little empathy will come in handy and if someone doesn't have patience they should be doing something else.
  17. Beaypepe, don't be discouraged. I signed up on May 5, 2017 and created my first WM. Then I continued and I was denied in various categories. Between some difficult categories, others that didn't fit, and some inpatient reviewer, I gave up on the game. They also had a little problem with someone on the forum who even had a blacklist of categories... Then I got active again in July 2020 and did everything until today. Yes, it's frustrating and there are arbitrary categories and reviewers, but it's important to keep going and have fun. however, there are many reviewers and categories that are worthwhile, nice, empathetic, kind, always willing to help and with other beautiful qualities with which you will never have a problem; and above all... I am very close to help you. But it's important to move on and have fun. DON'T LET IT
  18. I wanted to comment on a similar problem that happens to me with the WM when I create them. If I put the coordinates (almost always in DegDec) and create the WM, when I continue I get those published in the nearby category, so that they don't match, I go ahead and continue uploading photos, but the coordinates appear at 00.000000 . Sometimes I re-edit a few times and it's still the same. The same if I change Deg Dec for other.
  19. @wayfrog I think you can now close this forum since the waymark was denied by a vote against (we already know who it could be) and one abstention. And at least, it is clear that things were not so easy or clear in the category.
  20. Congratulation phil, some day I could be this milestone too :-(
  21. Sorry Alfouine, but the one who doesn't seem to understand is you. I have a total of over 150 WMs that didn't get accepted, and almost twice as many of them deleted because I agreed with the decision. I have only said that I informed myself with several people, the one who says that wayfrog agrees or not, is you. In this category I focus on published WMs of the same waymarker with the same point, which is more serious. I have been denied WM in other categories, which have already been published, for having been poorly published, as you say. The problem, if you look in the forums, is that I have protested about three WMs, and precisely, you deny them in a sometimes arbitrary way. It is not the first time that you have sent me a WM back for "bad photos" according to your criteria, and they are valid for 4 or 5 different categories published by the same brand. I will accept the rules of a category when they are clear, up to date and not applied arbitrarily. Or can you deny me a publication if a category does not require a photo or requires one for putting a good one and another or two bad ones greater than the good one? or you can denied other because it has photos... of my Tripadvisor count. Well, you've done it. Apply the criteria well and I won't complain anymore. It seems to me that a little more humility is needed. PD and with more than 8800 WN published one is a little, but the rules are the rules. And of course, what I always say: my greats and thanks for the reviewers that review the game.
×
×
  • Create New...