kayakanimal
-
Posts
298 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by kayakanimal
-
-
Not all of those options are going to be handled to your satisfaction on this particular site. Get over it.
I WILL NOT GET OVER IT! I have a voice. I will use it. That is what a forum is for. Just because we don't agree...things do not have to be on the personal side.
Actually, that part of my post wasn't directed at you. It was directed at the incessant whiners who post topic after topic complaining that their virt wasn't approved and demand that everyone come to their rescue without doing a dadgum thing about it themselves.
Ok, Thanks.
About these (many) places that don't allow caches...
I have not heard about this happening before now. I "assume" that cachers are doing everything they can to remedy this?
Tell the truth now...do you REALLY think this would change if virts didn't exist, or no more would be approved?
I would like to hear what you think.
-
Not all of those options are going to be handled to your satisfaction on this particular site. Get over it.
I WILL NOT GET OVER IT! I have a voice. I will use it. That is what a forum is for. Just because we don't agree...things do not have to be on the personal side.
-
An argument that parks in general are leaning towards only allowing virtuals which endangers the goal of a healthy hobby with a lot of different cache types has merit if it has truth behind it.
Chattahoochee-Oconee National Forests in Georgia has now banned everything but virtual caches within the forest.
Won't it be fun to be able to hunt nothing but virtual caches within National Forests all across the nation soon?
And the ONLY reason is because virts exist? My guess would be not.
But, I do think this is NOT a good thing.
-
Sorry..it's getting late, I'm getting tired.
I agree to a point.
I think someone could point out bad things about ANY type of cache.
But I can also point out good things about ALL types.
See ya'll in the morning.
Kayakanimal
-
2. (redone) I don't think we should change the concept of how caches work because of a few landowners.
We don't need to help them ban caching
I think you are helping me make one of my main points for me better than I can.As for size, we should all push for the right size cache for the location.
I think there are MANY place a virt is perfect. Such as at an airport. Just like micros have NO place in the woods.
To quote Jeremy: Virtual caches were created due to the inaccessability of caching in areas that discourage it.
I have only found a few places that could not support a micro, although a micro could be placed in the immediate vicinity.
Virts have nothing to do with size. They are a different game entirely.
With a cache, you have to find it, retrieve it, log it, and replace it without letting Muggles know what you've been doing.
With a virt, you just have to look like a tourist and take pictures of historical markers or interesting objects.
Virts have nothing to do with size. They are a different game entirely.
With a cache, you have to find it, retrieve it, log it, and replace it without letting Muggles know what you've been doing.
With a virt, you just have to look like a tourist and take pictures of historical markers or interesting objects.
I agree.
-
dadgum!!! I need to pay more attention!
I saw no icon for someone with blinders on.
Thanks,
Kayakanimal
-
I see, let's stop allowing virutals because of a few poorly placed caches!?!?
Boy did you miss the point.
Let's stop virts because land managers are pointing to those and saying, "You can still play your game here without placing a container."
I DO understand your point.
1. Sorry if I ruffled your feathers. It was just some good natured ribbing.
2. I don't think the correct concept of the types of caches because of "those" (you didn't say how may) few land owners.
3. If some land owners would only accept micros...should we stop them also?
(2 and 3 are serious answers and questions)
I think you need to re-write #2. It doesn't make any sense the way it's written.
As for size, we should all push for the right size cache for the location. Micros should not be hidden where an ammo box can easily go. Too small of a container for the surroundings only leads to trampling the terrain looking for that needle in a haystack.
You are correct. Trying to write this while playing with my 15 month old. Sorry.
2. (redone) I don't think we should change the concept of how caches work because of a few landowners. Better?
I think you are helping me make one of my main points for me better than I can.
As for size, we should all push for the right size cache for the location.
I think there are MANY place a virt is perfect. Such as at an airport. Just like micros have NO place in the woods.
Just remember...
Mature adults can agree to disagree.
Kayakanimal
-
I personally am more interested in the locationless caches. I am rather new to the whole hobby but I have learned about many things from rock circles in England, to lost drive-ins across the country, to large rock letters on the sides of mountains, to the challenge of finding a point that can be logged that has 5 of the same number in its coordinates. Many of these can be very difficult and challenging. A big plus is that alot of them can be done simultaneously by people all around the world or across the country whereas a traditional or virtual requires you to be within the general vicinity. Some of the virtuals can be pretty lame unless they have some kind of work involved. Such as solving a puzzle, searching for clues from provided hints etc. This gives a sense of accomplishment that a traditional cache seems to lack. I did a traditional yesterday that took a grand total of 3 minutes from the time I parked the car. On the other hand, I have been trying to find a locationless one by doing the research online for 2 days. (I think I have a drive-in nearby and also a quintuplets that I can log). The rock circles one had me very interested but as I am in NY, it isn't possible.
I hate when some people try to influence others as to what they can or cannot do. When somebody tells you to filter out certain things because they dont like them, I dont agree. If they dont like it, they dont have to do it. Don't force your opinions on others. Just like if they dont like whats on a particular TV channel, they should just change the channel.
I still think they should be approved to keep out the incredibly stupid cases but not banned altogether.
You may be young (in cache numbers) but you are wise my son.
I like the locationless caches also. I kind of agree with you about the lame virts. Most I have done have some type of history lessons with them I LOVE THOSE!
I have also done MANY physical caches that took me LESS then 3 minutes to find.
I hate when some people try to influence others as to what they can or cannot do. When somebody tells you to filter out certain things because they don't like them, I don't agree. If they don't like it, they don't have to do it. Don't force your opinions on others.
The reason I said they could filter them out is so the don't have to do them if they don't want to...so I think we agree on this.
-
I see, let's stop allowing virutals because of a few poorly placed caches!?!?
Boy did you miss the point.
Let's stop virts because land managers are pointing to those and saying, "You can still play your game here without placing a container."
I DO understand your point.
1. Sorry if I ruffled your feathers. It was just some good natured ribbing.
2. I don't think the correct concept of the types of caches because of "those" (you didn't say how may) few land owners.
3. If some land owners would only accept micros...should we stop them also?
(2 and 3 are serious answers and questions)
-
Hey...they were a good idea at one point. Why not now?
I've read several times in the forums how some land managers have banned physical caches merely because virtuals are an alternative
Is that the ONLY reason or maybe:
Some people place caches in inappropriate places?
Maybe we should not approve traditional caches any more!?!?!
OK...OK...Sorry...it is hard to type with my "dry wit"
So rather than help defend the basis of this activity, you want to give those land managers more virtuals to throw in our faces?
I see, let's stop geocaching altogether because of a few poorly placed caches
That was what I was thinking...almost...
I see, let's stop allowing virutals because of a few poorly placed caches!?!?
-
Hey...they were a good idea at one point. Why not now?
I've read several times in the forums how some land managers have banned physical caches merely because virtuals are an alternative
Is that the ONLY reason or maybe:
Some people place caches in inappropriate places?
Maybe we should not approve traditional caches any more!?!?!
OK...OK...Sorry...it is hard to type with my "dry wit"
-
Was just reading another forum and thought this "stupid" idea up...
Wouldn't it be cool if Cachemate could send way points from a certain categories to a GPS? When I go out of town all that information would be stored into my palm until needed!
What ya think?
-
That's what I've been doing (PQ to GPS, then GPS to TopoUSA). It's not that much trouble, really, but I'm always looking for a better mousetrap.
Thanks,
DadONine
Check out CacheMate for your Palm. It is THE BEST!
-
COOL!!!
-
Yep, lots of reasons to go back.....
The dead bird on the trail virt - name the species for credit.
The lost tennis shoe on the side of the trail virt - name the brand and size.
The mailbox in front of the house that was torn down virt- what was the address?
The old paint can in the woods left by a litterer virt - what color was the paint?
The old tire in the ditch virt - what is the speed rating?
Wow, glad we let all those virts in.
Wow!
I have seen these talked about before...does anyone have the links to these caches?
-
The dead bird on the trail virt - name the species for credit.
Shove a micro under it and call it a traditional cache
The lost tennis shoe on the side of the trail virt - name the brand and size.
Again...the micro thing
The mailbox in front of the house that was torn down virt- what was the address?
Hey...this can be a traditional size huh?
The old paint can in the woods left by a litterer virt - what color was the paint?
Ditto
The old tire in the ditch virt - what is the speed rating?
A BIG traditional!
It's all in the eye of the beholder.
Somehow this doesn't seem to be strengthening your position for virtuals.
My position for virtuals:
MOST are fun. Just like MOST traditionals are fun. Do/should you not approve a traditional cache because it doesn't have a WOW factor? If someone makes a virtual that is inappropriate the cache should be archived (or not approved in the first place). NO difference than a traditional cache.
Just wondering Jeremy...
Do you have these stats:
1. How many Traditional caches exist?
2. How many virtuals exist?
3. How many of each have been logged for some given time frame?
It seems that if you get this kind of response about cachers wanting virts...maybe you should rethink them. If some cachers don't like them they have the option of NOT doing them.
Hey...they were a good idea at one point. Why not now?
-
Virtuals, micros, locationless, etc...they should ALL be allowed and even more variants should be added. You "purists" need to get a life. This is a GAME and should be FUN! If people want to come up with variants that are FUN for them and others it should be encouraged.
Geocaching is not just a bunch of hippies hiding tupperware containers in the northwest anymore.
Relax and enjoy...
CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP
-
We love virtuals, both as owners and as finders. We have learned so much and seen so much historical stuff we never would have known about. The last few I have tried to submit have been denied.
I get stories from "We are no longer approving virtuals" to "Many people don't like them" to "Geocaching is really NOT a virtual game but real caches" and "We are opening up a special forum just for virtuals"....so which is it?
I for one would LOVE for virtuals to, again, be approved. Did I miss the announcement of new approvals or special forum?
Bonnie
I agree with that. I also think the guidelines could be relaxed a LITTLE in a place where you CAN'T put a traditional cache...like an airport.
BTW...careful of getting brow beat about opening this can of worms.
-
Yep, lots of reasons to go back.....
The dead bird on the trail virt - name the species for credit.
The lost tennis shoe on the side of the trail virt - name the brand and size.
The mailbox in front of the house that was torn down virt- what was the address?
The old paint can in the woods left by a litterer virt - what color was the paint?
The old tire in the ditch virt - what is the speed rating?
Wow, glad we let all those virts in.
Wow!
The dead bird on the trail virt - name the species for credit.
Shove a micro under it and call it a traditional cache
The lost tennis shoe on the side of the trail virt - name the brand and size.
Again...the micro thing
The mailbox in front of the house that was torn down virt- what was the address?
Hey...this can be a traditional size huh?
The old paint can in the woods left by a litterer virt - what color was the paint?
Ditto
The old tire in the ditch virt - what is the speed rating?
A BIG traditional!
It's all in the eye of the beholder.
-
I've been reading the messages in this forum, and I just want to say that I love ya to death for all the hard work you do and dedication that you have to this site to keep it running fairly smoothly for all of us.
Yeah, I know it's your job, but you must like it an awful lot to put up with us instead of going caching all the time like alot of us do.
I agree fully. Yes there are some things that I would like to see different (such as virt caches) but this place is FUN! I check it MULTIPLE times a day and cache as much as I can. Once my 15 month old starts to walk more...LOOK OUT!!! Here we come!
For the people that are not members...Remember how much this costs you.
And for the cachers that ARE members...remember how LITTLE this costs you.
Keep up the good work,
Kayakanimal
-
I was pretty proud that he chose to visit one of my caches:
It takes ummmmm, balls, to be different. I respect that. (Pardon me. I punned.)
Sorry to burst your bubble but this cacher IS NOT nude! He has sandals on!
-
my opinion is if something is buryed you need a shovel or something to dig it back up. this is open, you can see it, you dont need tools to remove it, itll just pull out. in my book thats fine.
i dont see a problem with it.
aj
From the Geocaching Listing Requirements/Guidelines:
If a shovel, trowel or other “pointy” object is used to dig, whether in order to hide or to find the cache, then it is not appropriate.From the eBay pictures, it looks like you'd need to create a hole in the ground of an exact size and depth into which the fake drain container would be placed. A cache like this shouldn't get approved.
I didn't have to use tools for mine. This whole area is sand. Yes...you need to make a small hole. I don't think it is a problem. I think what GC meant by this was NOT to dig a hole and then cover it back up!
-
Sorry not to pick up the humor. I took it as a serious question because many people seem to think clouds and rain are a problem, as well as the fact that I've gone caching in adverse conditions before and find it fun.
I heard this huricane ain't so bad. Course I guess Florida don't have a lot of elevation so bad is relative to where you are.
We are waiting for Charley (currently 105mph and climbing) not Bonnie (55mph).
-
Should not be any problem, unless you are in a downpour and the windshield has a constant heavysheet of water on it. Also your wipers may interfer somewhat, but rain, clouds, snow and the like in and of themselves are not a problem. The GPS frequency signal was selected because it travels through such conditions almost totally unaffected.
Sorry...my dry sense of humor. I have used mine in MANY rain showers (living in FL). Was TRYING to be funny. Guess it didn't work.
Kayakanimal
Virtual Hides
in Website
Posted
I have obtained permission for all of my caches. All the land owners/administrators around here think it is a draw for more people to their parks etc and love it.
Example:
Trains! The administrator of the museum thinks it is a great idea to pull in more customers.
When I did my Planes! cache I made sure to check with the manager of our small local airport. He is now a cacher! He thought it would have been cool to put it ON the airport property but instead he suggested putting it just outside the fence.
In Highlands Hammock state park the Ranger is all for caches such as it's first "Gentlemen, Start Your Engines!"
My suggestion is if the rangers have some kind of problem...DOCUMENT EVERYTHING! All meetings etc. Then try your congressman, Senator or whoever is higher up and will listen. Make sure to tell them you are a registered voter when you contact them.
Also try sending a letter to the newspaper. They love this kind of stuff! (I use to work for one. Especially small local newspapers). Make sure to tell them how KID FRIENDLY this sport is.
Remember...The squeaky wheel gets the grease!
Everybody has a boss. Keep going up the ladder until you get a positive response.
Will it be easy? NO! Or maybe not. Will it be worth the trouble? That answer is up to you.