ameryan

If I were the sort to let me fun be spoiled by others, my relaxing evening reading the geocache forum might have been spoiled by some of the intolerant responses on this forum thread. There are ways to discuss and disagree without being rude to each other.

I only have 51 finds, but out of those 51 a few of the more imaginative hides were nanos ..... I appreciate the creative ingenuity that went into them. I don't need to know what size it is before I hunt. That is certainly able to be part of the fun. As a matter of fact, I think there is one that I have listed as a DNF that might be a nano - but, oh well. I'll look for it again another day. I don't think the size should be a 'requirement' to list. Leave it up the the hider. Seekers are free to search only for those that list the size if it is that important to them. Oh, and in answer to taking off the nano listing from the log - by all means, do so. The cache belongs to the owner, and that request should be honored. If not, remove the log. It doesn't matter if the log scrolls of the page soon or not - I often read several pages of logs!

Did you check the log to see when the last time the cache was found .... there is always a chance it is gone. I've found that to be the case a few times now, especially if no one has logged the cache in a longer period of time than most of the others in the area.... just a thought. Good luck!