Earthdog Patrick

spoilers are bad.

The problem with that is, it's a proven fact that at least 53% of the population has the common sense of a rock. They need rules to guide their behavior. They'd eat dirt, unless there was someone there to tell them not to...

Brilliant post. Nobody with an ounce of sense will attempt to attack it. However, I REALLY wish people would quit using this annoying phrase. In order for comedy to work, it has to have an element of truth. There is NO evidence of a healthy grey wolf ever making an unprovoked attack on humans in North America. Ever! As long as I'm up on my soapbox, what's this snarky reference to "beasts in the forest"? huh??

I have no clue

GET ME OUTTA HERE IT'S FREEZIN

NANOS ARE DUMB

I have two humans that I take along caching!

Keystone's note is a joke answer to a joke. He can't possibly be serious, that would be too,too funny!!!

SO FAR SO GOOD

Here's some updated data about selected cache series. If you have any additions, corrections, etc., Please Post Here. Indiana Spirit Quest, Allied with ISQ,.............2-25-04, 684 caches, SixDogTeam and 34+ hiders. Ohio Spirit Quest, Allied with ISQ,.......... ......5-9-05, 49 caches, *The Shadow*/Moop Along and 6+ hiders Michigan Spirit Quest, Allied with ISQ,...........11-14-05, 47 caches, Wolverine Warriors and 7+ hiders. Minnesota Spirit Quest, Allied with ISQ,..... ...5-26-08, 1 cache, King Boreas Ontario Spirit Quest, Allied with ISQ,.............4-12-05, 1 cache, Team Tigger International Wisconsin Spirit Quest, Allied with ISQ,.........10-1-08, 54 caches, Sweet Life Georgia Spirit Quest, Allied with ISQ,............10-12-08, 21 caches, LZ33 and 1+ hiders North Dakota Spirit Quest, Allied with ISQ,... 5-17-08, 4 caches, Totem Clan Kentucky Spirit Quest, Allied with ISQ,...........11-16-08, 8 caches, Cav Scout Florida Spirit Quest, Allied with ISQ................05-07-09, 5 caches, Trader Rick and Rosie New Jersey Spirit Quest, Allied with ISQ.....COMING SOON , GIPSIE ******************************************************************** PC Spirit Quest [indiana] Acknowledges ISQ,...5-1-05, 8 caches, Team Bobby Mac Colorado Spirit Quest, Acknowledges ISQ,.......6-3-08, 288 caches, Ivy Dog Parents and 26+ hiders Louisiana Spirit Quest, Acknowledges ISQ........1-31-09, 2 caches, Zsandman +1 ~KSY [Kentucky], Copycat series ...................5-5-06, 143 caches ******************************************************************** BC Spirit Quest, Independent,........................ ......4-11-07, 30 caches, Legacy Pac Maine Spirit Quest, Independent, ................... .......5-7-06, 36 caches, Northwoods Explorer New Hampshire Spirit Quest, Independent...............9-21-08, 1 cache, King.Hubi Texas Spirit Quest Independent,............................11-11-08, 27 caches, Condor 1 and 2+ hiders Whatcom Spirit Quest [Washington], Independent,...10-15-05, 25 caches, Half Canadian and Scooter Illinois Spirit Quest, Independent,..........................2-4-09, 76 caches, Joranda and 3+ hiders AB. Spirit Quest, Independent...............................4-19-09, 6 Caches, Donnord ********************************************************************** "SQ" cache series: Michigan -- ...64 Caches Ohio --..........80 caches Texas --........ 2 caches Indiana --...... 1 cache WSQ [Wisconsin] --14 caches?? Ontario --..... 2 caches

Yes, we need more rules, much more rules.

#690 -- Che K

phone a friend????nah! May as well phone a phorum!!!

Oh, Brian!!! You're right in saying that he should not tell others how to play. Groundspeak does that. There has to be RULES, tho, dadgummit! I bet you wouldn't want me to chew on your ear in the pile during a flag football game... ps I can outrun you.

This is taking puritanism to a new level. Surely you meant to say if a cacher visited a cache of yours and there was a logbook present and in signable condition and he did not sign it, then he did not find your cache. Personally, I can't see how not signing the log would affect either the fact that I visited your cache or that I found it. What failure to sign the log would do would be to make it harder for the cache owner to verify that I found the cache. That would mean that if the cache owner felt my log was bogus he could delete it without consequence. The no ALR guideline would mean that if my signature was in the log book then the cache owner could not delete my online log. "Puritanism", at any level, is not necessarily a bad thing, as you imply.

Yeah, the arrogance is getting a little overwhelming...

When I do this, I get threatened.

you might get more interest in the off-topic area. There are many restaurant review sites on the internet...

It IS important what catches you search. It IS important the catches you hide. What is NOT important, is how you play the game.

There is no "a" in the w ord cemetery.

Dude! It's a film can! Fire off an SBA and be done with it! Dude! It's a film can! Carry logs in baggies to help out your fellow CO's! We do!

As long as there are hotdogs, they will come!!

Let's go caching!!

Outstanding I know both those INDIANA GEOCACHERS in the article ! That guy in the photo looks like some kind of stinky escaped convict!!