Jump to content

AbacoRick

+Premium Members
  • Posts

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by AbacoRick

  1. I received an email as well and was likewise, dubious. But if it was a phishing attempt they went to alot of trouble, as they knew my "handle" and the 25 caches they want me to check are all legit and geolocated close to my home. Unfortunately, many of them were rough to find and I'm not sure I have those bushwhacks in me again. To get better participation, they need to do a little better job identifying themselves in this process, as it comes across as "phishy". The word "Groundspeak" appears nowhere so I also was wary.
  2. I agree with edexter. I have one multi-cache in play right now with three physical stages in one fairly large park. I am tempted to archive it and re-apply with 3 separate physical caches just because my activity level on this one is so low compared to my other traditional hides. I put a good deal of effort in it, and the final is a quasi-gadget cache so I was hoping it would be a simple intro to multi-caches with a decent payoff in a very nice park. I have had several claim finds but all they did was find Stage 1 and there is no log to sign there, only a strip of paper with coordinates. So when I DO get notice of a logged find, if they don't comment on multiple stages, I usually message them and ask about the condition of the final. Sometimes they admit they only found the first stage. I educate them and move on. I don't delete their find if they are newbies, though I know I could.
  3. They should add an attribute requirement for BYOP and then allow you to filter by that. That would eliminate the pill bottles, film canisters, bisons, nanos etc.
×
×
  • Create New...