As it happens, in the case of the cache concerned, the first 'needs maintenance' was posted a few weeks ago, not months on end. Since the cache hasn't been linked on the forum, it's easy to assume it has indeed been abandoned for months on end, which simply isn't the case. There are many caches out there with needs maintenance logs going back further than this one. If it wasn't for someone wanting to place a new cache there wouldn't even be a discussion about it here.
thanks to everyone here for their advice...seems like i opened a can of worms,some mixed emotions it seems.
my intention wasnt to get a cache archived so i could place mine, rather it was to incourage cachers to visit the area. i had spoken to other cachers who decided not to go visit the area due to the logs saying it was missing or in poor condition.
sorry if i offended anyone.