Jump to content

Ms.Scrabbler

+Premium Members
  • Posts

    487
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Ms.Scrabbler

  1. Going a bit off the original topic here. I looked at the 3 finds the OP has, saw there were photos posted, but they had nothing to do with the cache and nothing to do with geocaching at all.

    Printing cards with those pictures to leave in a cache as a signature item would be a great idea.

    But talking as a cache owner, they don't belong in the image gallery. just my opinion.

  2. My issue isn't with dangerous caches, I do go after a few myself. I take issue when a dangerous cahce isn't listed properly as such - i.e. proper raitings, attributes, and listings of any special equipment one may need. Yes, I understand when you get ot a cacher or at least in the area of such you can then determine if it is beyond your ability or current gear, but that is a bit of a waste of time.

    My point exactly it is better to go looking in areas that you're certain of but that's only my opinion other people think differently but again You can ever know what you need if you go looking for dangerous caches -_-

    Not true.

    Read the description, read the logs, check the attributes, check the ratings. Then go back and do it again and if you're still not sure, it may not be for you.

  3. The first thought that came to my mind was "Pipe bomb"....

     

    Hmmm... I would think that any camouflaged container found by a Muggle might raise some eyebrows. I guess that's why it's important to clearly mark your cache, identifying it as such, and providing the URL so those investigating such a container might be better able to determine its innocent nature.

    I don't think any of the comments made were personal, and if you don't hang out here on a regular basis you may not be aware of all the blown up caches.

     

    Yes, caches should be identified like you did, however, if someone were making a real pipe bomb, they could easily write the same on the pipe bomb, that's where the question of "is it or isn't it" comes in.

     

    Placing one like you made in the woods away from daily traffic might work.

  4. Why are there webcams INSIDE the library? I find that kind of creepy.

     

    From the cache page:

     

    This library has a haunting history. You can read about it on their website.

    Inside this library there are several webcams. These webcams are used to help spot paranormal activity.

    Creepy was a good word for it! :lol:

    pumpkins are paranormal?

  5. Yep and uhhh I guess so.

     

    Our very own Lord British owns 2 pieces of property that are currently on the lunar surface...

     

    Garriott bought the Luna 21 lander and the Lunokhod 2 rover (both currently on lunar surface) from the Lavochkin Association for $68,500 in December 1993 at a Sotheby's auction in New York.
    .

     

    Owning a junk 'car' is not the same as owning the 'property' it is sitting on.

     

    Sorry Snooggie, WRONG ANSWER! :lol:

     

    Don't mistake 'property' for 'land' or 'real estate', the latter CAN be 'property', but so can all sorts of things including lunar landers and rovers... or your GPS, car, and so forth.

     

    Snoogans wins!

     

    Doug 7rxc

    So I win the bet in one post and lose it in the next. :mad:

  6. If you don't find it give it a DNF but DO NOT randomly give it a Needs Maintenance or Needs Archived.

     

    If there are DNF logs going back over a year by veteran cachers on a cache with a low difficulty and low terrain, and I spend time searching GZ, I'll log a NM, as the owner should be checking why 15 people in a row couldn't find their p-n-g that's a key hider under a bench, or a film canister in a guard rail.

    That's why I also said "Use common sense"

  7. Yeah. I really start to wonder. Got four logs today "TFTC!". Same person. Yes. They are urban caches (three micros and one small). But many think the views are spectacular. "TFTC!" Guess you really didn't enjoy it? :blink:

    Yeah. It's starting to get me down.

    Read a slew of these in one day on mine and ones I'm watching:

    "Out on a power run in the area with ..... . Thanks to all who placed caches to help us met our objective. SL"

    C/P for sure, all had the same wrong word. Fellow cacher wrote about the same thing.

    It's so disappointing when you see a lot of found emails and you open one after the other and read the exact same message.

  8. If you don't find it give it a DNF but DO NOT randomly give it a Needs Maintenance or Needs Archived. Sometimes NM is correct if you find broken pieces, etc.

    Use common sense.

     

    *this is not in response to OZ2CPU's post. Missed theirs before writing the above*

  9. A Moon based MPS nav system would be OK.

    Wouldn't it be "LPS"? Lunar Positioning System?

    In fact, NASA has already been developing just such a system: NASA designs lunar positioning system for exploration

    That article was from 2008, though, so who knows what the status of that project may be today.

    I was thinking about the lack of tree coverage. So we need to get another unit. Have to wonder how much that would cost!

×
×
  • Create New...