Just a couple of questions. I really am curious because I don't understand it all.
1) What is "spineless" about noting caches where people claim finds when they didn't actually find anything?
2) Why would you claim a find when you didn't find the cache?
1.)What is spineless is that you people don't have the decency to voice your concerns to me directly - whoever first noticed my heinous crime could've e-mailed me directly and told me that they didn't think I should've logged that cache (I have since un-logged it). Instead, you post to these forums and apparently all get a chuckle as to how superior you are to the rest of the cachers who are out there trying to have a good time instead of sitiing at their computers judging others.
2.) I logged the cache as a find after the owner told me to - it helped him discover that it was missing. I have since un-logged it now that I know that the cache-police (literally) are watching my every move.
Why do you care who logs what anyway? It's just people trying to have fun. Are you so insecure/competetive in your own numbers that you have to monitor everyone else? And yes, "Wadcutter", I see you actually have quite a few. It's a game.
Oh - and if I posted this incorrectly again so that my name shows, I DON'T CARE. I'm not trying to hide here in this forum.
