t4e

maybe if GC didn't "hide" the "enable" section and would have made it bold or red or anything that would be obvious those new to the game wouldn't miss it

what exactly is your concern with this caches? i don't see anything remotely making them look real They look real enough! Besides read what I posted from Johnny-Geo's blog. That explains it all. if those look real i'm the Queen of England you can spot them a mile away as fakes, if they were in the middle of real electrical boxes i would understand your concern i wish i had a dollar for every thread on this subject and that blog being mentioned

what exactly is your concern with this caches? i don't see anything remotely making them look real

kind of hard to pick a favorite FTF, there were a few, but here's one Kings Keep 10 months after being published this cache was still unfound, so on a nice spring day we decided to make the 200 km drive on way plus the ferry crossing plus the canoe paddle to the cache location ....but if i had to do it all over again i will in a heartbeat we had a great day discovering this little place i'm very slow at typing so by the time i get to log my caches dfx already beats me to it and has all the details laid out, but i don't mind at all because he seems to not only type faster but also be better at telling a story, so in addition to the pictures i posted his log will have the full story of our day

actually i just looked at it is just the reference number not the tracking number http://www.geocaching.com/seek/log.aspx?LUID=6ddb4a89-de9c-4b87-b166-7d4ee2b732ab

why...cache is still fine, post a NA just because someone wants the spot?

http://htmltips.blogspot.com/2004/05/marquees-scrolling-banners.html

you, as the owner of the TB can either delete their log, which will not impact the mileage traveled, or permanently encrypt the log just go and click on "visit log"

You seemed to pass plenty of judgement those who post valid NA logs. finding a cache and posting NM and NA are separate things afaic...the latter is rather reporting on issues while finding a cache is playing i still maintain that if you have not been at the cache you have no business posting NM or NA logs, its the "job" of those with first hand experience to do it since the cache is archived now i don't even see what is the point of this thread still being "alive", the OP's question was answered and any answers from now on are irrelevant and offtopic

i would not take for granted the reply you get from the embassy though ultimately the border officials have the latitude to decide

i read that as meaning "let them accumulate before checking on it" if its an easy hide i usually check on mine after a couple of DNF's, otherwise i let go more before i do

The Sarcasm Society* Welcomes You

forget the cops, look for the snipers on the top of the hotel, seriously

use the Field Notes to log your caches and you will see the date you marked them found as for editing your log, yes you can go to the cache page and find your log bottom right corner there is a link called "View / Edit Log / Images Upload Image" click on it and on next page click "edit log"

maybe because he/she lives in Ontario and their own disabled cache is in Newfoundland? couldn't help noticing the friendly tone of the reviewer over there, nice touch addressing the cacher by their name

QFT

No, which is why so many are saying that the cache should be archived, because the owner is allowing abuse of the cache. BTW, it isn't a right, it's an obligation. please do show me where it is stated as being an obligation, cause i must have missed that part of the guideline since my property taxes include a portion for schools, when i don't have any, would it also be an obligation for me to go knock on each door and see if the kids in my neighborhood that i pay the taxes for do well in school? On log deletion. On finding a webcam cache. "You will need to have them to save the picture in order to log the cache." "The picture" is in reference to "existing web cameras placed by individuals or agencies that monitor various areas like parks or business complexes. The idea is to get yourself in front of the camera to log your visit." So, if you don't log the cache as described in the second link, you have not "found" the cache. The owner, as outlined in the responsibilities of ownership, can choose to delete logs: "Logs that fail to meet stated requirements (such as Found It logs by people who have never found the cache) or logs that conflict with our Terms of Use Agreement may be deleted." To be "obligated," one must be compelled "to constrain by physical, legal, social, or moral means," or, "to do a service or favor for" someone or something. Sounds to me like an obligation, in this case, is what the owner has to their cache listing and logs therein. i think this is really being taken too far, we're getting into legal and social responsibilities? its a webcam cache for crying out loud apparently though some people can sleep better now knowing they spoiled the fun for so many others woohoo way to go there!

The trademark quote of those who don't want their conduct to be questioned. What are you saying? If what I'm doing doesn't affect you then what do you care? I'm trying to think of a parallel in the legal system. I guess your case is drugs. If I do drugs in my own home I'm not affecting you...but it is illegal. Maybe I should revise it. Live and let live. If my legal activity ain't directly affecting you then it shouldn't be bothering you either. Is that better? making a parallel between geocaching and illegal activities, seriously? now i am serisouly agigtated

No, which is why so many are saying that the cache should be archived, because the owner is allowing abuse of the cache. BTW, it isn't a right, it's an obligation. please do show me where it is stated as being an obligation, cause i must have missed that part of the guideline since my property taxes include a portion for schools, when i don't have any kids, would it also be an obligation for me to go knock on each door and see if the kids in my neighborhood that i pay the taxes for do well in school?

I see you're in Ontario. How does that give you the right to post a "Webcam Photo Taken" log on a broken webcam cache? (Yeah, I know. You were there last month) I see you mentioned you would eventually be posting a picture with your log... Is it safe to assume the picture you claim you will someday post came from the webcam linked on the cache page? No? Wouldn't that qualify as a bogus log? perhaps if you look at my activity for that week you will see i was in Vegas can you see the label on the picture in the log above mine? i guess your detective capabilities are a bit limited, it takes making wider observations no, its not a bogus log, I was physically at the location, the Co allowed the log why is anyone else's business? Were those pictures taken by the webcam as required in the logging requirements delineated on the cache page? . did the CO exercise his/her right to delete the allegedly non complying logs? That is not the question I asked. Were those pictures taken by the webcam as required in the logging requirements delineated on the cache page? . i don't have to answer you anything you have the means to find out for yourself having said that is not your cache and more importantly is not your right to pass judgment on how I chose to play, since i don't pass judgement on how YOU play

that is what i was getting at lets not open a can of worms the interpretation/enforcement of the guidelines is at the latitude of each reviewer

I see you're in Ontario. How does that give you the right to post a "Webcam Photo Taken" log on a broken webcam cache? (Yeah, I know. You were there last month) I see you mentioned you would eventually be posting a picture with your log... Is it safe to assume the picture you claim you will someday post came from the webcam linked on the cache page? No? Wouldn't that qualify as a bogus log? perhaps if you look at my activity for that week you will see i was in Vegas can you see the label on the picture in the log above mine? i guess your detective capabilities are a bit limited, it takes making wider observations no, its not a bogus log, I was physically at the location, the Co allowed the log why is anyone else's business? Were those pictures taken by the webcam as required in the logging requirements delineated on the cache page? . did the CO exercise his/her right to delete the allegedly non complying logs?

tbh i have no interest in your point as for "demons"? lmao people do take this game too seriously i think i'm going to have nightmares now

I see you're in Ontario. How does that give you the right to post a "Webcam Photo Taken" log on a broken webcam cache? (Yeah, I know. You were there last month) I see you mentioned you would eventually be posting a picture with your log... Is it safe to assume the picture you claim you will someday post came from the webcam linked on the cache page? No? Wouldn't that qualify as a bogus log? perhaps if you look at my activity for that week you will see i was in Vegas can you see the label on the picture in the log above mine? i guess your detective capabilities are a bit limited, it takes making wider observations no, its not a bogus log, I was physically at the location, the Co allowed the log why is anyone else's business? Ok, we get it. You were there. You logged a find. The cache is active. You submitted a photo of yourself at GZ, but not with the webcam that has been down for 1.5 years. You can deal with how you feel about your own log, and the owner can keep/delete as allowed in the guidelines. However, the cache should be, and has been reported. NM logs have been posted and not addressed by the owner. Now, please don't get into it, you two. There's no reason to make edits to add additional attacks to your post. what is your point? i am allowed to edit my post for 24 hours, i prefer that to making a zillion posts

i see you're in Oklahoma, how does that give you the right to post a NA? Because it needs to be brought to the reviewers attention no matter where it is. have you personally visited the cache? is the cache in violation of guidelines? have you personally been at the cache location?