Jump to content

Chipper3

+Premium Members
  • Posts

    168
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Chipper3

  1. 50 minutes ago, baer2006 said:

    Are there caches with a similar concept in your area? If so, classify yours as the same type as the others.

     

    I think the question whether to list multi-caches with field puzzles as Multi or Mystery has no single answer. Here in Germany, the reviewers have offered a simple guideline:

    • If you can read the listing, optionally grab necessary tools mentioned, and head right off to the posted coordinates, it's a multi - regardless of the number and nature of any field puzzles at the stages.
    • If you have to do homework first, to find out where to start, then it's a Mystery - even if the homework is trivial (like simply adding a given offset to the listing coordinates).

    Personally, I think this is a very useful guideline.

    Thank You!  Your guidelines make great sense! I like  the thought process that if the starting location is encrypted and work has to be done to even start then  it is a Mystery.

  2. I have a cache planned That gives true coords for the first Stage.

     

    There  are directions in the first cache for how to decrypt coded messages and coded combinations that are needed to find and open each lockbox in sequence  in the next 5 (hidden) stages.  Each stage has its on coded message that requires the tool described in the cache found at the posted coords. The last stage-7 has the log and the swag.  

     

    Would I classify this as a Multi Cache or a Mystery Cache?

  3. @31MBSG...   I just finished a My Map with existing caches in RED and added the stages of a planned multi-cache in YELLOW.  I just want to thank you again for your wonderful suggestion!

     

    I re-read your comment about seeing Stages of a 2nd party multi.    I assume if the stages are marked hidden in the original set-up then they will not show up.  I would not want someone to use this "back door" to find the stages without finding them in order and gaining the coords of the next stage from the stage-cache.

     

     

    • Upvote 1
  4. THANK YOU!

     

    Yes, just checking  out possibilites  Then I go back to google maps and zoom in and then do a 3D fly over before trooping out to the site for a real look.  Gives me an idea where to bushwhack. (And I do realize that  multis and puzzles could cut thru an area.)

     

    It is easier if I can kinda pin point an area with coords before switching back to google map when planning a string of multi-cache stations.

     

    I do see that geocaching map does show the center of the screen with coords and that window shows up in the bottom left corner.  I just position the target area in the center of the screen and grab those coords.  That helps a little so I can re-find that "spot" when switching  back to google map.

     

  5. 3 hours ago, Mineral2 said:

    One of my caches was placed in an area in which I just could not get a stable reading. The averaging took almost 10 minutes and even then, my location kept bouncing around over 50 feet in any direction from where I was. I ended up coming back a second day and still couldn't get a great reading, which meant that any finder coming along is also going to have a problem. I ended up giving specific directions as to which stump it was hidden in (there are many), and it has helped. That was by far the worst I've had trying to place a hide.

    I hear you!  I want to believe that the GPS system yield super accurate results but it's not the case IMHO.  Too may variables and then there is the problem of the seeker's iphone being inaccurate and the satellites are in a different position 6 months later, etc. All we can do is try our best to use accurate coords and offer some clues to help zero in on the actual location.    For example today, I use my Garmin 64ST to collect  a trillion readings to average a spot at 100% and then revisited that spot 2 more times to add to the "accuracy."   The I used my device to find my way to the recorded spot and I was 25 feet off.  I used my iPhone Geocache app and was 35 feet off in a different direction.  Then I used another device used for hiking and was also off.    I think I need to abandon the thought that I am dealing with pin-point accuracy. =)    I will always give the cache hunter a clue along with the coords.

     

    This inaccuracy is why the military (even with non wobbling gps signals) uses lasers to guide bombs to the targets.  =)

  6. 47 minutes ago, kunarion said:

    Typically an Averaging app will allow you to continue gathering more data whenever you return, and in theory that makes the computed point even better.

     

    Yes, My Garmin 64ST  does that.  I guess one can only do so much to try and be accurate.  

    I have adopted the technique you suggest and include a veiled clue as part of the description usually in the context of the story.

    For example, the coords take a seeker  to a spot and I include tha you should enter 7th Heaven and use the following projection.  7th Heaven is a the 7th basket on a frisbee golf course.

  7. Thank you, Thank You to all the responders for their excellent and experienced comments.

    I conclude that:

    1.  I will walk to a spot

    2. Let my GPSr "settle down."  aka wait a few minutes.

    3.  I am going to take a quick MARK reading just to have some extra data.

    4. I am going to set down the GPSr  and use the waypoint averaging feature  to create an averaged waypoint but not revisit that same waypoint later to add more data in the averaging dialog.

    5.  I am going to walk away  150 feet and then return to spot.

    6. I am going to repeat the  waypoint averaging but create a brand new 2nd averaged waypoint.  And average those two values.

    7.  I'll check on google earth as a sanity check but rely on the GPSr generated coords.

     

    • Upvote 1
  8. I am interested in using waypoint averaging feature on my Garmin 64st.

     

    What is best practice?

     

    I incorrectly  thought that I should just stand in one place and activate averaging.  Or should initiate  but stop and then come back at another reading for that same waypoint in the averaging dialog and repeat .  Different days different months, different times, etc.

     

     

    Or....?

     

    Chipper 3

  9. Thank you, Everyone!

     

    I just want to be sure and follow all of Groundspeaks Protocols before proceeding.  I know that Multi-Cache and Mystery Caches have very specific requirements and I want to follow the rules!

     

    I can unclick the GC coord checker that is part of my  mystery cache and insert the coding for a Certitude checker.

     

    The Certitude dialog window indicates that I can Enter a keyword and then leave the exact coord box blank and then use the dialog for if the  keyword is for a stage of a multi-stage multi (not Groundspeak term) and indicate which stage (1).  Then I assume that Certitude is going to return the correct coords for Stage 1 and then I can use my bearing and distance standard scheme  to point the seeker to the final cache location.

     

    Or is the reviewer gonna' frown on this approach?

     

    Ps  - Does anyone know how to delete or edit a Certitude created solution for a cache or find the html after closing the window?

     

     

  10. 15 minutes ago, barefootjeff said:

     

    The final coordinates in your listing must be where the actual physical cache and logbook are. Anything else, physical or virtual, along the way is a waypoint and should be listed as such on your page. That's how the reviewer will want to see it done. If the inbuilt checker doesn't cater for your puzzle, untick its checkbox and use a third-party checker instead.

    Thank You.  Got it!

     

  11. @funkymonkeyzone   Thank you for the great advice.  I am inclined to keep the searcher on tje GC site to eliminate a layer of confusion.

     

    So option 1 is to solve the puzzle and check the coords and  then navigate.

     

    Maybe an option 2 - Could I list as the final coords my stage 1 coords and then use my usual description instruction to shine a bright flashlight along bearing XYZ - 50 feet out (think night cache with cache location marked with reflective tape.)

     

    The solution takes the searcher to a spot that would normally be stage one in a multi-cache and they follow the projection from there to find the cache.  Or is that going to violate a rule/protocol?

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...