WH

I was one of the original WJTB distributors for Massachusetts and am WELL aware of the crap that the distributors can get.

It's possible that either he had just placed it and hadn't submitted it for approval yet or it was listed on another site. I do not think for a moment that a reviewer on this site would have approved it.

Before I begin, I just want to say that this IS NOT a thread for complaining about missing WJTB's. It's an attempt by me to maybe get a few of them back on the road. I would be willing to go to the store and buy 15 White Jeeps, make new tags, and release them. I would need Groundspeak to supply me with the tracking numbers for 15 mia Jeeps. Would this be possible?

Ill post the above thought in the Geocaching Website forum where Jeremy is more likely to see it.

That just gave me a thought. I would be willing to go to the store, buy 15 White Jeeps, make new tags for them and release them if Groundspeak would furnish me with the tracking numbers of 15 mia WJTB's. Do you think they would do that?

No angst?? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I'll have to get back to you.

I use the one briansnat refers too. If you visit a new state, simply add it's initials into the URL in your profile and you're done.

Please use the test posting thread pinned at the top of this forum for test posting.

Change your GPS units to UTM and thats how they will be displayed when you download them in your PQ's

The new satellite won't come online until the end of the year.

Trade up, trade even or don't trade sounds good on paper but reality is different. Many factors can contribute to the degradation of cache trade items: - inexperienced newbies - muggles - peoples differing views on what is and is not a fair trade - jerks Unfortunately, the quality of cache trade items degrade over time. People in these forums have discussed this subject back and forth and have yet to come up with a solution for there may not be one.

A person's cache count tally's the number of find logs, not the number of individual caches. If I only found 1 cache but posted 100 find logs, my stats would show 100 finds.

Isn't that the same article linked at the start of the thread?

My reception under tree cover rarely gets better than +/- 30 ft. I wonder if the new stronger signal will penetrate leaves any better?

Waymarking.com is the new home for locationless caches and will eventually replace virtuals too. It's currently only open to premium members because its still in early beta. It will be opened to all as soon as the new processes are ironed out.

Already being discussed here.

Markwell

CNN article.

Perhaps the category could be re-done for places that used to be Military installations. I know plenty of places in my area that were once used by the military and are now defunct.

My watchlist is empty. I get enough email as it is.

As AW said, start in the Waymarking forums way down on the bottom of the page. I do know, as of right now, they are not accepting new waymark proposals until they get all the details of the new process ironed out.

Im an idot. Please don't mind me.

Actually, distance between degrees of latitude decrease the closer to the poles you get. At 90 degrees N longitude, I can literally walk 180 degrees of latitude in just a couple steps. This distance is largest at the equator.

This should be posted in the Geocaching Topics forum.

From the Garmin website regarding the GPSMAP 60CS