Nemo Crownie

The previous posters are correct...in order to accomplish what you desire, you are talking survey grade equipment. But, I may have a solution for you. Many law enforcement agencies have Total Station equipment that is used for constructing scale depictions of areas such as crash scenes and crime scenes. In some smaller agencies, this equipment is used infrequently (many of these Total Stations were acquired via grants). If you have any rapport with a local law enforcement agency, you might be able to talk them into coming to your property to shoot your lot. I know that some of these officers would appreciate the chance to practice with the equipment, especially those who do not use it very often. You would want to clear your request with the local agency head (Chief, Sheriff, etc.) so as not to violate any of their policies. And, you might consider buying the guys lunch...they would certainly appreciate that! If nothing else, it's worth a shot asking...heck, they can't eat you.

OK...go figure. I just loaded the ".gpx" files again...for the third time, and now it works! I'm still puzzled, but it had to be something I was/wasn't doing. To answer your last question, StarBrand, there were a total of four (4) gpx files on the Oregon. There are now 6. At any rate, I dropped the two files into the "GPX" folder on the Oregon, and everything is Jake. Caches are found searching by name. No mapping though, of course. Thanks to all who took the time to respond...I do appreciate your thoughts and advice!

Have you exceeded the maximum number of caches the unit can hold?? How did you determine that the new caches are not showing up?? Exactly? Did you search alphabetically for them? Maximum number of caches exceeded? Not even close. After copying the ".gpx" file from the PQ into the "GPX" folder on the Oregon, I searched for the newly loaded caches by name. None are found. Specifically, these are caches from the islands of Grenada and St. Lucia. Grenada only has 6 caches on the whole island. St. Lucia a paltry two. Other islands with recently downloaded PQs...St. Thomas, St. Croix, Antigua, all had the "-wpts.gpx" file, and I can find those caches on the Oregon when searching by name. This is a puzzler. I used to consider myself competent in the use of my various GPSrs, but now I'm starting to wonder! I've never downloaded a cache straight from the GC.com site to the unit. If that is done, is the cache loaded as a ".loc" file? And, if so, does it contain limited information? We'll figure this out, eventually. In the meantime, I surely appreciate the advice and comments from the experts out there!

Interesting. I did try dropping just the ".gpx" file into my Oregon, but the caches do not show up. All of the other PQs I did yesterday for Caribbean islands had the "-wpts.gpx" file in addition to the ".gpx" file, and all of those caches show up in the Oregon. It's just these two I did today, that contain only the ".gpx" file, that the caches do not appear in the unit. Any ideas?

I've had a problem pop up today that I have never encountered before. I ran two PQs, both on Caribbean islands. I got my results fast enough, along with the emailed zip files. However, when I download and open up the zipped folders, there is only one file inside the folders...the ".gpx" file. Every other PQ I have run (thousands)contains two files in the zipped folder...the ".gpx" file, and a "-wpts.gpx" file. In order to transfer the files to my Oregon 450, and have it work, you need both the ".gpx" and the "-wpts.gpx" files. Has anyone else encountered this before? Is there an issue with GC.com today? Several queries I ran yesterday were returned with no issues...this just popped up today. Any help is appreciated!

OK...So I launched WebUpdater, and ran the Oregon through the update process. It was an update to version 3.80. The update apparently went as it should. Upon disconnecting the unit, it went through the software verification process. Then, it looked as though it was restarting, and went to a page that just says "Garmin." It has now been frozen on that page for over 30 minutes! Plus, pressing the power switch does nothing...can't even turn the thing off. Did the update just brick my Oregon?

I bought one of Garmin's microSD cards containing City Navigator North America 2011.10. When I put the card into my Oregon 450 (not 450T), I get a message saying "Can't Unlock Maps." No maps display, other than the basemap. I tried the microSD card in my 60CSx, and it works just fine. Anyone have any idea what's up with that? I thought the big advantage to the microSD cards was the ability to swap them from one unit to another, and not being "locked" to a specific unit. I have never seen this message on my Oregon before, and have no idea how you would "unlock" a microSD card. Any advice would be sincerely appreciated.

I'm looking to buy a version of City Navigator NT North America on a Micro SD Card. I would prefer the 2010 version, but will entertain any offers. Anyone...Anyone...Buehler...Buehler?

FYI...The eTrex Legend HCx that I had offered up for sale previously in this thread has been sold.

Beth, I have a unit that may be a very good deal, depending on how much you want to spend. It's all about value, ya know? We recently upgraded my wife's GPSr to a new Oregon 450, so I am looking to sell her previous unit, an eTrex Legend HCx. This Legend has seen very light use, and is in pristine, as new condition. It comes with a Garmin neoprene case, and has City Navigator NT 2009.10 maps, so you can do turn by turn navigation...as well as geocaching. I still have the original box, manuals and everything that came with it from Garmin. As I said, the unit is in superb condition, and you would be hard pressed to tell that it is not brand new. If you are interested, I will sell the unit for $130.00 shipped to you. You can contact me by leaving me a message via this site. If you like, I can take some photos and email them to you. Good luck in your hunt. Believe me, once you get started caching, this would only be your first GPSr!

I like it. You can count me in for a couple.

I received the books a couple days ago. They arrived fast, and in great shape. After perusing the book, I think it will make a great, and permanent, addition to my caching bag. Many thanks again for making these available to the geocaching community...you're a Great American!

Thanks for making these available. I sent you a PayPal donation for three books yesterday. One will stay in my caching pack, the other two are for caching buddies. Many thanks again.

Is your Palm Z22 still available?

I can't say for 100% certainty, but I would imagine the only difference would be in the basemap. If you plan to add mapping software, it won't be an issue. The satellites don't care where you are!

Sorry for the double post. The system hung up, and timed out. I hit the Add Reply button again. Dummy!

I have the 60CSx, and I recently purchased the Legend HCx for my wife (caching partner). So, I have the benefit of having used both! As previously mentioned, the Legend HCx does have the high sensitivity chip, albeit a different model than what is in the 60CSx. In my non-technical experience with both of these units, the Legend HCx appears to grab a sat lock a little quicker than my 60. We are, however, talking mere moments here...nothing that would steer me toward one over the other. Also, the 60CSx has the electronic compass and barometer, if that is important to you, while the Legend HCx does not. The best thing to do is head on down to your local retailer, and try them both out. See which one feels best in your hand. I have fairly large hands, and the 60CSx just feels more at home in my paws. Others have made mention of the spongy buttons on the 60, but I have never found that to be an issue. Perhaps it is just because that is what I am used to. The Legend HCx, however, can be had for quite a bit less than the 60. I was able to latch onto the Legend HCx, bundled with City Navigator NT 2008 and an auto mount, for less than $200. Bottom line...both are great units, and you would no doubt be happy with either.

I have the 60CSx, and I recently purchased the Legend HCx for my wife (caching partner). So, I have the benefit of having used both! As previously mentioned, the Legend HCx does have the high sensitivity chip, albeit a different model than what is in the 60CSx. In my non-technical experience with both of these units, the Legend HCx appears to grab a sat lock a little quicker than my 60. We are, however, talking mere moments here...nothing that would steer me toward one over the other. Also, the 60CSx has the electronic compass and barometer, if that is important to you, while the Legend HCx does not. The best thing to do is head on down to your local retailer, and try them both out. See which one feels best in your hand. I have fairly large hands, and the 60CSx just feels more at home in my paws. Others have made mention of the spongy buttons on the 60, but I have never found that to be an issue. Perhaps it is just because that is what I am used to. The Legend HCx, however, can be had for quite a bit less than the 60. I was able to latch onto the Legend HCx, bundled with City Navigator NT 2008 and an auto mount, for less than $200. Bottom line...both are great units, and you would no doubt be happy with either.

Then let me suggest that you are doing it wrong. Would LEOs here agree that attracting that much LE attention while caching is probably not good for the activity? Here's a standard LE answer for you...It depends! If someone is out caching at noon on their lunchbreak in a city park, I'm not going to give them a second thought. If they're behind a business at 0200 with a flashlight, you can bet they're gonna get checked! In either event, once I am satisfied there is no criminal activity afoot, everything is cool in his world and mine. While it may not be the smartest move to be out caching in the wee hours of the morning, I don't hassle citizens for engaging in lawful activities. I might, however, recommend they use better judgment as to when and where they are. As far as being contacted by the police being "bad" for the sport...I don't think so. In fact, bringing geocaching to the attention of your local cops is probably a good thing. Most cachers I have met are good, responsible people who respect things like park hours, private property, government lands, and the like. Anything we can do to put a positive "spin" on the sport is a bonus. Just my $.02.

Relatively new to geocaching, but a crusty vet at police work. 22 years and counting in the Kansas City suburbs.

Just testing.

Hey, jjtrout...something isn't working right. I have received no responses from you, either in my email or my inbox here. Try clicking on my name, Nemo Crownie, and then clicking on the link to send an email. Good Luck!

I never heard back from him. Maybe it's been sold?

Message sent.

I have a GPS V that I may be convinced to part with, if you are looking for one. Near mint condition (9/10), always adult owned and used and never abused. Used it for vehicle nav only, so it has never seen the woods. I had not really thought about selling it before, but in truth, I think I suffer from the "too many Garmins" syndrome. If interested, let me know.