clappy

Thanks for resolving it! It now shows correct (yearly) subscription.

This messsage is still a thing. I am a subscriber (in Germany) since 2016 and have been converted to monthly payment. No option to revert that. It also says to check into PayPal to change the subscription, but there is no option either. Why has this been changed without notice in the first place? It could have been easily solved with a big message upon re-visiting: "Current legislation requires you to re-opt-in to an annual subscription... etc." I would not have noticed the change to the way more expensive monthly payment if not for the forum posts. By the way: I suspect the auto-change to a much higher monthly subscription price without explicit consent not very legal under German FCCA law... since it effectively does the opposite.

@Bl4ckH4wkGER I tried it yesterday with just one, then 3 drafts. GClh was active, I did not think about that. I used the new draft page for months, never really used the (very) old one. I just went back there to see if the drafts/field notes appeared there. Win 10, Opera 83.0.4254.27. I just did another try, this time with GClh completely disabled. Now it worked fine. Might probably have been the AddOn. With the parameter disabled it works with activated AddOn. As much as I'd prefer the Log Type Icon in front, maybe a quick and dirty solution would having it appear as an AddOn to the Cache Type similar to: Apart from all this I would like to stress the need for constructive feedback, simple venting or ranting does not help anyone. Speaking from experience with these crowds...

While the "new drafts" worked for me quite well over the last months, they do not really work anymore. My profile pic shows the number of drafts but the draft page remains empty. the "old drafts" page (which I never really used) shows my uploaded drafts. Addendum: I can confirm @thebruce0's observation: The new drafts list only loads if opened in a new tab that is not the currently viewed tab. They had that before today's update. There was a little arrow next to the cache title indicating a direct link to the cache listing. I don't understand why they removed it. I also second the addition of the log type! In my opinion, the cache type symbol is also rather large....

I have completed the Natural Wonders yesterday (logged today), got the Souvenir. Today I did another outing specifically for 5/7 of the Solar System. After logging online, they are still at 0. They have not been awarded, why? EDIT: Okay, they are here, about 30 min after logging.

To everyone stating a Bonus has to be a Mystery: This may be in the guidelines, however, it is handled differently. For example, a search in Western Europe (Filter Multi, Letterbox and the word "Bonus") yields a lot. And even some very recent AL-Bonus caches. https://www.geocaching.com/play/map?lat=50.52041218671903&lng=7.767333984375&zoom=7&asc=true&sort=distance&ct=3%2C5&cn=Bonus Even given the fact that not all of these are "real Bonus caches" (and only have the word in the title), still, quite a number are in fact bonus caches. And that also happens in the US: GC8NC24 (Published 27 Aug), GC856N7 (Published 19 Aug), others in Denver, Los Angeles, etc. So, what will happen here?

So with all this nonsense by HQ, I will archive my new puzzle cache which was relying on externally hosted pictures (some with EXIF) before it was even published. Thanks for hours spent in vain. I might just throw out a bunch of trads to guardposts, it doesn't seem to be about quality at all...

I really appreciate this change! I've had the problem of armchair loggers, that use database answers on my earthcaches. I have already updated all my cache listings to the changed guidelines. Photos are a good way to see if people were onsite or not. However, I will be reasonable with cachers in the next few weeks. The same as I've been with wrong answers as long as I have the impression that people were actually there.

I can just repeat what previous posts said: The Browse map is one of the most used features, a search map just doesn't make sense as default. I'd like to add, that the layer options are also disappointing. Google and the "Geocaching" layer are not very detailed and hence useless, when I usually use a generic OSM (like OSM Default or German style)m which have almost every tiny trail mapped. Just look at this earlier post. Or see if you spot any differences here... Default OSM layer. Geocaching layer. I will switch over to Project GC and use their Live map until you fix this. The layers are missing in the mobile app too, but I'm not using it anyway except for messages...

This is possible, I just added the "Field Puzzle" attribute to the LBH via this workaround. @GC HQ: Please add the attribute option to LBH, too.