Frank Broughton

Kind sir you left out the part about OP being a sock puppet Maybe so, but others might be looking for the information just posted....

Why not - if the "OWNER" wants to change it, is it not his prerogative? I should have specified that the last statement was simply my opinion on Mingo, and in no way should be interpreted as anything official. When I envision Mingo, my brain produces a regular, not a micro. That's just a quirk deep down in my gray matter. I should probably point out that any opinion I might offer is less than valid, as I've never been to Mingo. Obviously, the cache belongs to the owner, and they can do with it as they wish. Got ya! kapeesh!

... if it actually was real, that is. What proof do you have that this is a liar's cache? No proof, just going by what's posted on the cache page (esp. in the logs), and by gut feeling. Well, the CO has about 10,000 forum posts, and could answer himself. But he hasn't been heard from in years. He must not like us anymore. well since:http://forums.Groundspeak.com/GC/index.php?showtopic=274400&view=findpost&p=4718588 maybe they got raptured after all?

Weee ewww Weeee ewww Weeee ewww! Pull over, this is the cache police, you will be given one warning only! Actually Lil Devil is a member of the cache police. Perhaps you should tone down the smartaleck remarks before the cache police from Pennsylvania pulls you over. too funny!

I'm in agreement with everything except this line. The Reviewers have certain limits on their authority. Refusing to activate a cache listing solely because of the container, goes well outside those limits. There is no "rule" saying a Reviewer can enforce their personal bias. Since the Reviewer is enforcing their personal bias, they are, by definition, "making up rules". But I'm with you on Mingo ain't Mingo if it's a Bison tube. Why not - with the argument always being made that GS is "just" a listing service, if the "OWNER" wants to change it, is it not his prerogative?

wonder what they are saying now, will have to ask MickEMT 'er I mean ST?

hmmm i was curious where that comment comes from so i found this...is this reviewer for real? all i can say is: ridiculous! Okay, so I will spare everyone my personal opinion on whether Mingo should stay or whether it being replaced by a micro is dumb. That being said I cannot believe that a Reviewer is making up rules as they go! If I were the CO I would not stand for that. Unless I'm missing something it appears as if this reviewer is allowing their personal opinion about what this cache should be to decide its fate. Mingo or a random L and L, that would bother me either way. Makes me yet again very thankful for the AWESOME 4 reviewers I am privileged to deal with on a regular basis. Oh gosh, in this particular case, oldest active cache in the world, I'm gonna bet tbe reviewer got guidance from Groundspeak, or the super top-secret reviewer only forum. Heck, there could very well be a "mingo in jeopardy" thread over there too. I must agree with the basic premise, there are many who think some reviewers make up their own rules. Yes, and they say I am bad.... {grin} No, not "they", that was just me, Frank. haha you big bully you...

The way it has been for a long time is the first log you enter it has the current date. If you change the date, say your logging finds from a couple days ago, the next log will have the date you entered. This is a very desirable feature if your entering a number of caches a couple days late. Let's hope TPTB *never* change this behavior. Agree completely with jholly on this.

This is how it has always been, no? At least for me it has been.

Not as of this moment. What are you posting about? I was being very sarcastic. Yes, and they say I am bad.... {grin}

Huh? Me?? not a chance, you cannot see through my simple diabolical style of keeping alive..... how dastardly! Really though, no way on the get a life.... you read too much into that one my north towns friend. Just stirring the soup as it was starting to burn.

But he's right. Most "normal" caches in this situation would have been shut down for good by this time. ..... and

JeePSer it is just a fun game sir.... with no prizes or scoreboards.

That is nice!

Too funny!

haha "not grumpy this morning..... I'm not crusty. I'm not grumpy. I'm not a man. I may be old, though. " That made me laugh out loud for real. Someone has to drive the drivel, I took it to task. Yo Geoff aka thebruce the professional web designer why are all your sites you have listed in your sig using third party WP templates? haha sorry had to ask? scroll down some and see all that white space....

Yo ho ho Raine, Jeremy, Moun10bike - have a question, do ya'all sit back in the office and have a pool to see how many people on the forums here have conniption fits on the trivial for each update? Bet everyone bid under on this one..... I would bet a good amount that most of those having these fits would not have even looked at the page in question for weeks without the said update notice, yet such a horrible thing - the sky is falling, look out peoples..... This one takes the cake though as king of trivial! Wowsie kapowsie.

man oh man, of all the things to gripe about this one has to be the pettiest yet! How many even look at that page often....... arg, crusty grumpy old men just gripe about anything.

Is there a way to turn this off, please? I would much rather see our current log activity at the top of the page. Thank you, Mrs. Car54 Yes, I too would like the ability to turn this new "feature" off. You guys do realize it is only the latest 5 caches that are displayed here right? It is only on the detailed view that 50 are shown. We can look into adding the ability to minimize those lists if it becomes a real issue. I just do not see how anyone can be griping about this. It looks fine to me. I like it. How does this take away from anything peoples?

+1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10! This would be very nice and a good improvement.

Please do not ask for threads to be closed.

Maybe because we have such great soil here where I live that I see no issue with digging. Black awesome soil in most places by me. Also winter here has a way of fixing things!

In civil court, disclaimers do not protect a person or entity who is found to have committed gross negligence. Generally, that's the first motion to be filed. If the lawyer can get the judge to agree that deleting a NA which was posted on an illegal hide constitutes gross neglect, then whoever deleted it no longer has that blanket protection. I said that in my first post in this thread. Disclaimers do not absolve liability for wrongs. They do show an organization does due diligence and can prevent punitive damages. (Clan, I am signing a disclaimer soon to make the rounds with my Police Officer nephew in a few weeks - should be interesting.)

Bunch of old bitter farts with nothing better in life to do I guess...... Francis, this is a Geocaching forum. We discuss Geocaching. Because you posted to this thread, does that mean you have nothing better in life to do? Don't think that's mean or anything, I know Frank Personally. haha - yeppers I know, I was being facetious... Mean, you My Yuck ever mean? naw.... haha Maybe the Urkman might have thought about it once or twice, but never Mr Yuck!

Ain't gonna happen! Go RAVENS ! ! ! Wait make that....... did not happen!~