I would just like every person who has repeated that mantra to explain to me why, if geocaching.com has no responsibility for the caches that have been approved by its reviewers, that those same reviewers so often take it upon themselves to archive caches they suspect of having a problem? Is that not clear enough indication that geocaching.com does, in fact, accept at least partial responsibility for the caches?
In the case of caches abandoned by inactive owners, if geocaching.com does not accept at least partial responsibility for the caches it lists, shouldn't the reviewers wait until the geocaching community asks for such caches to be archived?
I can't imagine you truly believe that. In fact, if folks were arguing the side you've taken, I'd almost guarantee you'd be arguing the other side - that gc.com doesn't have responsibility for the physical cache.
Welcome Team DEMP!
You have seen the light brother!
You have seen the truth!
Congratulations.
I like that 95 percent editing rate for his post. It would appear he throws them out there without thinking and has to fix them almost everytime.
Ah yes, back to the woodwork for me. My work here is done.