RCH65
-
Posts
104 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by RCH65
-
-
On 5/13/2022 at 5:18 PM, RCH65 said:
Can't recreate the problem right now. Everything is fine.
Here we go again... 😨
Now even one step earlier after clicking on 'view map'{ "code": "CSS_CHUNK_LOAD_FAILED", "type": "error", "request": "https://www.geocaching.com/play/map/public/ActionBar.css" }{ "componentStack": "\n at Lazy\n at Suspense\n at div\n at div\n at div\n at x (https://www.geocaching.com/play/map/public/SearchMapDecorators.302c6cd0f4a07b726ddc.js:2:112440)\n at div\n at div\n at oe (https://www.geocaching.com/play/map/public/SearchMapDecorators.302c6cd0f4a07b726ddc.js:2:91214)\n at C (https://www.geocaching.com/play/map/public/web-map.3.1.0.ffc2fa6443c5f75875a4.js:2:195093)\n at s (https://www.geocaching.com/play/map/public/SearchMapDecorators.302c6cd0f4a07b726ddc.js:2:81490)\n at O\n at u (https://www.geocaching.com/play/map/public/web-map.3.1.0.ffc2fa6443c5f75875a4.js:2:402215)\n at L\n at t.SidebarProvider (https://www.geocaching.com/play/map/public/SearchMapDecorators.302c6cd0f4a07b726ddc.js:2:10943)\n at M\n at t.ActiveCacheProvider (https://www.geocaching.com/play/map/public/SearchMapDecorators.302c6cd0f4a07b726ddc.js:2:75249)\n at T\n at t.MobileListProvider (https://www.geocaching.com/play/map/public/SearchMapDecorators.302c6cd0f4a07b726ddc.js:2:15962)\n at P\n at t.ActiveListProvider (https://www.geocaching.com/play/map/public/SearchMapDecorators.302c6cd0f4a07b726ddc.js:2:77235)\n at D\n at t.ViewProvider (https://www.geocaching.com/play/map/public/SearchMapDecorators.302c6cd0f4a07b726ddc.js:2:17699)\n at E\n at t.ApiProvider (https://www.geocaching.com/play/map/public/SearchMapDecorators.302c6cd0f4a07b726ddc.js:2:18210)\n at A\n at s (https://www.geocaching.com/play/map/public/SearchMapDecorators.302c6cd0f4a07b726ddc.js:2:80360)\n at x\n at t.MapProvider (https://www.geocaching.com/play/map/public/SearchMapDecorators.302c6cd0f4a07b726ddc.js:2:78380)\n at F\n at t.BrowserProvider (https://www.geocaching.com/play/map/public/SearchMapDecorators.302c6cd0f4a07b726ddc.js:2:28034)\n at k\n at t (https://www.geocaching.com/play/map/public/web-map.3.1.0.ffc2fa6443c5f75875a4.js:2:112036)\n at Suspense\n at t.TranslationProvider (https://www.geocaching.com/play/map/public/web-map.3.1.0.ffc2fa6443c5f75875a4.js:2:784804)\n at n (https://www.geocaching.com/play/map/public/web-map.3.1.0.ffc2fa6443c5f75875a4.js:2:422991)\n at t (https://www.geocaching.com/play/map/public/web-map.3.1.0.ffc2fa6443c5f75875a4.js:2:114152)\n at t (https://www.geocaching.com/play/map/public/web-map.3.1.0.ffc2fa6443c5f75875a4.js:2:108533)\n at l (https://www.geocaching.com/play/map/public/web-map.3.1.0.ffc2fa6443c5f75875a4.js:2:353073)\n at o (https://www.geocaching.com/play/map/public/web-map.3.1.0.ffc2fa6443c5f75875a4.js:2:354528)\n at C (https://www.geocaching.com/play/map/public/web-map.3.1.0.ffc2fa6443c5f75875a4.js:2:195093)\n at f (https://www.geocaching.com/play/map/public/web-map.3.1.0.ffc2fa6443c5f75875a4.js:2:193158)\n at C (https://www.geocaching.com/play/map/public/web-map.3.1.0.ffc2fa6443c5f75875a4.js:2:735806)\n at div\n at i (https://www.geocaching.com/play/map/public/web-map.3.1.0.ffc2fa6443c5f75875a4.js:2:1089861)\n at C (https://www.geocaching.com/play/map/public/web-map.3.1.0.ffc2fa6443c5f75875a4.js:2:714332)\n at h\n at t.LimitSearchProvider (https://www.geocaching.com/play/map/public/web-map.3.1.0.ffc2fa6443c5f75875a4.js:2:227307)\n at p\n at v (https://www.geocaching.com/play/map/public/web-map.3.1.0.ffc2fa6443c5f75875a4.js:2:319697)\n at v\n at t.FiltersProvider (https://www.geocaching.com/play/map/public/web-map.3.1.0.ffc2fa6443c5f75875a4.js:2:707983)\n at g\n at t.ExperienceProvider (https://www.geocaching.com/play/map/public/web-map.3.1.0.ffc2fa6443c5f75875a4.js:2:706378)\n at m\n at t.UserProvider (https://www.geocaching.com/play/map/public/web-map.3.1.0.ffc2fa6443c5f75875a4.js:2:798898)" }Chrome 101.0.4951.67 (WIN 10)
No scripts active.
Works on Edge (same machine) -
18 minutes ago, Bl4ckH4wkGER said:
I am not able to reproduce what is shown in your screenshots. Both maps work fine on my machine with Chrome (Version 101.0.4951.67 (Official Build) (64-bit)).
Strange... everything back to normal right now...
Maybe it depends on to which server (instance) I am/was connecting to (?)
Can't recreate the problem right now. Everything is fine.
-
Update:
- Both maps (search & browse) work on Microsoft Edge
- Cleared all related cookies in Chrome to remove old setting but no success. None of the maps work in Chrome
-
Have the same issue on Chrome 101.0.4951.67 (WIN 10) when clicking on a cache on the map:
Tried switching over to 'browse geocaches' but the map there is completely messed up:
Makes it very hard to plan our weekend... 😨
-
16 hours ago, Zop said:
When uploading field notes from GPS using the older and better logging page, it would upload the 'drafts' found since the previous upload.
Trying today, we are unable to upload our field notes with the error "Cannot Upload More Than 1000 Caches at a Time"From time to time you have to empty the geocache_visits.txt file on your GPS device.
The error occurs as soon as there are more than 1000 records in the text file.
It looks like the process is uploading only new drafts (since the last upload) but this is not true.
It's always uploading the entire file and the webservice throws away duplicate entries.-
2
-
-
-
Veeeeery annoying...
Can't open links (even checkers) in a 2nd tab anymore by pressing CTRL-
.png)
4
-
2
-
.png)
1
-
-
Ten years later... and we're still on GPX 1.0.1 without...
- links to images
- personal notes
- "changed coordinates" indicator
I know... the online API (available to handpicked developers) is sexy, cool and strategic... and downloading data (for undefined purpose to everyone!) is quite evil.
It's still ridicoulously hard to perform a simple task like 'marking solved caches' on an offline GPSr without API access and 3rd party software.
Believe me... there *are* reasons to use an offline GPS receiver.Why don't you give us the ability to write our own scripts by simply processing a GPX file?
BTW: It's not *your* data... it's *our* data...
-
1
-
.png)
1
-
1
-
-
On 10/3/2021 at 1:00 AM, rassilon256 said:
Once you've solved a mystery cache the pin on the map moves to the real location. I've looked around both on the website and the iOS app and can't see any way to look at the posted location after solving. What am I missing?
This is easy on the website:
Just click on the 'pencil' (next to the solved coordinates in italic) and it will show the original coordinates. -
Everything could have been so nice...
An open Live API for everybody and evolving GPX versions containing even 'exotic data' like personal notes, links to images or Adventure Labs.
Obviously, the fear of losing control over their (our!) data seems to be overwhelming. Otherwise, I can't explain, what they are (not) doing.-
8
-
-
9 minutes ago, S-Man42 said:
Ich kann diese Einstellung nicht finden, wo ist die?
-
2
-
-
Es gibt ja noch eine weitere Umschaltmöglichkeit:
Auf der (neuen) 'Search Geocaches' Seite ist rechts die Kartenauswahl mit den drei (nutzlosen) Karten: Geocaching, Google Road Map, Google Satellite.
Das lässt sich wohl nicht ändern.Auf der 'Browse Geocaches' Seite kann ich rechts aus der ganzen Liste der (OSM-)Karten auswählen sofern ich links unter 'Set Map Preferences' die 'Leaflet' Auswahl getroffen habe. Sonst erscheinen auch dort nur die Google Map Optionen.
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Even after 3 months, there are still bugs in the new search result function.
When looking at a cacher's profile, the caches are being sorted by 'found date of the user' (latest on top), which is displayed in the 'Found On' column . So far, so good.
This works correctly until 'dynamic data reload' is taking place (after 50 caches). From there, the 'Found On' column is showing the 'last found' date of the cache and not the found date of the user (anymore).
Correct 'Found it' date above the red bar - incorrect 'Found it' date below red bar
This was reported a few times shortly after the April release.
If you can't fix this, you should bring back traditional paging.
So called 'modern solutions' are useless, if they do not work properly...
-
9
-
1
-
3
-
1
-
2 hours ago, Wolfsrudel1989 said:
Ich tendiere zu ASCII bzw Hex.
Hat da jemand eine Ahnung ?
Hallo Wolfsrudel1989
Das Forum ist natürlich nicht dazu da, um Mysteries zu lösen... andernfalls wären die Mysteries ja keine Mysteries mehr...
Aber ja... das sind Daten, die ganz offensichtlich in hexadezimaler Darstellung aufgeführt werden. Falls Du vermutest, dass das (hexadezimal codierte) ASCII Daten sein könnten, würde ich mal eine Google Suche mit "HEX to ASCII" absetzen. Ich bin mir ziemlich sicher, dass Da *ganz oben* ein Link erscheint, bei dem man die HEX Daten reinkopieren kann und der dann die Daten in lesbare Zeichen umsetzt (sofern dies wirklich hexadezimal codierte ASCII Daten sein sollten)... ;-)-
1
-
-
Any news on this matter?
Talk to us!
-
1
-
1
-
-
Thank you for bringing back the 'correct' default sorting for viewing.
However, there's still a bug when content is loaded dynamically while scrolling down.
The sequence of the records seems to be correct (sorted by the *user's* "Found on" date when viewing someone else's finds) but the content is *not*.
The "Found on" date of the user (green in the example snapshot) then changes to the (latest) "Found on" date *of the cache* (red in the example snapshot).
-
2
-
1
-
-
43 minutes ago, thebruce0 said:
That default sort order to match the old list really needs to be the first hotfix to assuage much of the reflex response here. And be fixed so it still works after scrolling...
And be fixed so it still works after scrolling... (!!)-
1
-
-
Why sorted from nearest to farthest?
This only makes sense when searching for a particular location.
Now, in most cases, you have to create the result list three times:
- Default -> Nearest to farthest
- Click on 'Found on' -> Oldest to newest
- Another click on 'Found on' -> Newest to Oldest
Poor hamsters...-
3
-
2
-
-
Hmmm... strange things happen.
It works! It *never* worked for me - not even once! And I tried many, many (many!) times.
But now it does. Wow.I'm wondering what caused the difference.
Hope this will last for a while... ?
-
1
-
-
There is a (undocumented? well hidden?) function when writing a log: Press '@' and you get a list of your friends to choose from. This is a very nice feature to mention somone, including a working link to his/her profile and an automatic 'Someone mentioned you...'-Mail to the referred profile. Nice!
However, the function seems to be quite buggy.
-
The popup list shows 10 (randomly selected?) friends. That's it.
I'm pretty sure that - some time ago - it was possible to select additional/other friends by pressing the first letter of their profile name.
This doesn't work anymore. - The function only works once. If you press ESC, it won't popup again.
Is this just me?
Anyone else using this function? (BTW: Is this an officially supported function? Can't find any documentation...)
-
1
-
The popup list shows 10 (randomly selected?) friends. That's it.
-
19 hours ago, terratin said:
So I use .png images to illustrate geological concepts on my EarthCaches. I currently host them on Imgur. If I understand it those will stay. But for the future do I have to make scientific drawings in jpg?
As far as I understand, you still may use PNG images - but not from Imgur (not allowed) and not from img.geocaching.com (automatic JPEG conversion).
According to https://www.geocaching.com/help/index.php?pg=kb.chapter&id=97&pgid=956 you may use Dropbox or Google Drive to host your PNG image. -
2 minutes ago, geoleena said:
Aha, yes it is a certificate issue. Likewise it could be fixed also by Groundspeak, I think.
Yes. Definitely an incorrect configuration.
2 minutes ago, geoleena said:The 3rd party sites give the same error so again it is probably somehow invalid or incorrect certificate.
Some of them just do not have HTTPS (geotrowel.me.uk in GC3AK1K). Others do have HTTPS but no own certificate (mattsphotobooks.com in GC7T963 is using the certificate of its hoster wpxhosting.com). There shouldn't be unsecured HTTP connections in 2020 and it's probably a good idea to move this stuff to the geocaching.com servers.
-
1 hour ago, geoleena said:
Failed to load resource: net::ERR_CERT_COMMON_NAME_INVALID
So the issue seems to be the mixed content. Additionally the img.Groundspeak.com server seems not to support https. This is something Groundspeak could fix
img.Groundspeak.com DOES support HTTPS - but is using a geocaching.com certificate.
Just change the URL from http://img.Groundspeak.com/.. to https://img.geocaching.com/...-
1
-
-
Ads are (at least) on these pages:
- Dashboard
- Cache Listing (doesn't even fit)
-
- My Lists
- My Profile
-
Result Lists
- Memory Lane
- Souvenirs
- Watchlist
- ...and so so...
-
1
.png)
.png)
.png)
Error message Geocaching.com via Safari
in Website
Posted