Jump to content

dfx

+Premium Members
  • Posts

    7004
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by dfx

  1. There are lots of apps and websites using the API that are completely free.

     

    Really? When I search the market on my Android phone, I don't see any apps that are "completely free" and provide the same functionality.

    I didn't say anywhere in my post that there were Android apps that were equivalent to c:geo and free. I don't know where you got that from. All I said was that there are free apps using the API, contrary to what your earlier statement implied. There is no cost associated with using the API, so cost can't be the reason for the "no scraping" clause.

     

    I didn't say there was cost involved in using the API. I don't know where you got that from. :rolleyes:

  2. Anyway, there's no cost associated with using the API, so your original statement is completely false. There are lots of apps and websites using the API that are completely free.

     

    Really? When I search the market on my Android phone, I don't see any apps that are "completely free" and provide the same functionality.

  3. My original Droid and now my Droid Bionic have very accurate GPS capabilities. They are actually better than my 5 or 6 year old Garmin 76cs.

     

    I'm gonna call BS on that. Just because the phone tells you that the accuracy is +- 2 meters and the GPS only tells you +- 3 meters, it doesn't make it true. Do a proper test and you'll see that the GPS still wins.

     

    However, it's still true that a lot of smartphones are accurate enough for geocaching. But then again, a map and a compass can also be accurate enough for geocaching...

  4. Just adding that GPX 1.0.1 isn't really GPX 1.0.1, but rather GPX 1.0 with the Groundspeak extensions version 1.0.1.

     

    And no, Garmins can't handle attributes natively. There's some tricks you can pull to make them visible (convert them to text and put them into a description or a fake log entry etc).

  5. . . . however the way you're doing it makes the puzzle unsolvable should gs decide to clean up the image server. . .

    Okay. I didn't realize how the "delete photo" process worked. So for now, you just delete the link from the page but as far as Groundspeak is concerned, you don't actually want the photos and can go through the trouble of deleting all the photos during a clean up of their servers.

     

    After their long standing policy of never actually deleting deleted photos, I predict that such a cleanup would cause a rather large outcry from all the people who were (ab)using that "feature" for such a long time. I also predict that this wouldn't keep GS from doing it anyway. :rolleyes:

  6. Didn't notice any stickiness, but did notice some large inaccuracies in adverse conditions. Typical GPS behavior really... You're in one spot, it says GZ is there, five minutes later it has you 10 meters over there, so you go to the new GZ, only to be brought back to the old spot again. Rinse repeat. Previously it would just stick to one spot, obviously. But that's just how GPS is, isn't it.

  7. "Keep me!" on the tag is just about as confusing a matter as anyone could have come up with.

     

    Whose brainchild was that one?

     

    Certainly not very well thought-out.

     

    I think it's very well thought out. Groundspeak would rather like to see you buy a new tag than re-use an old one. The wording achieves exactly that.

  8. AFAIC the copy tags were never meant to be replacements for re-releasing a lost TB. They were meant to be kept by the owner - as physical souvenir(?) of the actual TB that's out there. Just like the military dog tags, they also always come in pairs.

  9. At least ONE person figured out a solution (thank you opens source) and posted it. Others have found work-arounds but the rest of you think it's GS's responsibility? Figure out how to do this on your OWN using the WORLD WIDE WEB.

     

    This is actually between YOU satellite junkies and Google... GS is caught in the middle because of YOUR dependency on those maps.

     

    Wow. Seriously? Groundspeak doesn't want to give out any bulk cache data to 3rd parties, so yes, it is their responsibility to provide a high quality mapping solution to their users, so they can browse caches the way they want to. GS doesn't want anyone else to be able to offer anything like that (not with their data, anyway). Stop the Greasemonkey madness already, get Groundspeak to provide a usable site instead, or give bulk access to the cache data to 3rd parties who in turn can provide a usable site.

×
×
  • Create New...